Skip to comments.
Churchill, Hitler and Newt
Pittsburgh Live ^
| February 20, 2006
| Patrick J. Buchanan
Posted on 02/21/2006 11:44:01 AM PST by Courdeleon02
Edited on 02/21/2006 12:07:03 PM PST by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: Courdeleon02
As I said in this post's last incarnation where you have a Churchill and a Hitler you probably also have a Chamberlain and a Quisling. One responder also mentioned Lindberg.
Which role does Buchanan play?
To: Courdeleon02
About the only part of the article I can agree with concerns the lunacy of bombing the Serbs.
No question Iran doesn't have the wherewithal of Nazi Germany, but warfare has also changed dramatically since that time with the rise of terrorism and advent of nukes. Iran is certainly a destabilizing and dangerous factor in a very important part of the world and Ahmadinejad has visions which aren't that much different from Hitler's in many respects.
To: Courdeleon02
I'm not a big Buchanan fan ... but just once I'd like to read one of his articles followed by intelligent refutation of his arguments rather than a hundred "Pat is an idiot" posts.
To: Oliver Optic
Like bereanway's #22 ... thanks.
To: Courdeleon02
This man truly doesn't know anything. Churchill was way ahead of Buchanan in intelligence and judgment.
I like the line from another Freeper: "Pat's uncle died in a concentration camp. Fell right out of his tower."
To: Oliver Optic
The war drums are usually pounded by those who are the arm chair generals and those who never served in the military and never faced the bullets flying.
To: farlander
I find Iranians just a *bit* less for each of these categories.Have you seen the Muslim rave video?
27
posted on
02/21/2006 12:24:43 PM PST
by
CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
(Toon Town, Iran...........where reality is the real fantasy.)
To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
No, actually I have not. Do they behead one of the rave attendees ? Or do they all just sit around mumbling in two separete (male/female) rooms ?
To: Oliver Optic
I'd like to read one of his articles followed by intelligent refutation of his arguments rather than a hundred "Pat is an idiot" posts. That might not be possible as Pat has no spiritual grounding nor political grounding.
Pat somehow thinks he is the smartest person in the world and everyone else is stupid.
He is only interested in hearing Pat talk.
29
posted on
02/21/2006 12:28:14 PM PST
by
Uri’el-2012
(Trust in YHvH forever, for the LORD, YHvH is the Rock eternal. (Isaiah 26:4))
To: farlander
TAKE A LOOK...........
http://www.glumbert.com/media/rave.html
30
posted on
02/21/2006 12:29:56 PM PST
by
CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
(Toon Town, Iran...........where reality is the real fantasy.)
To: Courdeleon02
Of course Pat is a great admirer of Hilter who Pat refers to as "an individual of great courage, a soldier's soldier in the Great War, a political organizer of the first rank, a leader steeped in the history of Europe, who possessed oratorical powers that could awe..."
To: Courdeleon02
Comments like this will soon be forgotten when Iran tests its bomb. There is no value in letting outsiders speculate about whether or not you have the bomb, the Iranians would be far better off demonstrating it to the world. By showing they already have a sophisticated and deliverable nuclear device, options for invasion or preemptive strikes vanish least they set off a nuclear war. The Democrats will of course blame Bush for not doing anything and letting this happen, but will hamstring him from doing anything about the bomb militarily. The weak kneed in Israel will also prevent the IDF from doing anything least the Iranians lob a bomb on Tel Aviv. Muslim fanatics will rejoice at the prospect of nuclear weapons in their jihad against the west and Israel and Iran will assume a position of preeminence in the Muslim world. They have everything to gain by going all out to complete their bomb while the west wrings its collective hands and the UN thinks about meaningless sanctions.
32
posted on
02/21/2006 12:35:15 PM PST
by
The Great RJ
("Mir wölle bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
To: Courdeleon02
Is there another URL link to Buchanan's article in the original German?
33
posted on
02/21/2006 12:36:06 PM PST
by
mkjessup
(The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
To: Always Right
Of course Pat is a great admirer of Hilter who Pat refers to as "...a leader steeped in the history of Europe, who possessed oratorical powers that could awe..."
That sounds like demon possession. No doubt in my mind.
34
posted on
02/21/2006 12:38:42 PM PST
by
mkjessup
(The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
Comment #35 Removed by Moderator
To: Courdeleon02
Poor, poor Pat. He is trying to stake out some exclusive political territory to differentiate himself from the pack. Too bad he chose some swamp land on the lunatic fringe.
To: Courdeleon02
"those who never served in the military and never faced the bullets flying."That includes Pitty Pat.
To: Courdeleon02
I admire how Pat invoked Godwin's Law and autoflamed himself before half the article was over...
To: marron
Hitler should have been finished in 1923 when he led a failed uprising in Munich. You're 100% correct. The lesson of Hitler, a lesson the dolt Pat Buchanan is incapable of learning, is that we don't wait until the fate of civilization hangs in the balance. We don't put ourselves at the mercy of lunatics with nuclear weapons. The Iranian mullahs and the Syrian dictator Assad are currently funding and supporting those who kill Americans in Iraq. We've let them get away with that. Now, Pat wants to let them get away with getting a nuke too? For God's sake, Buchanan grow up. You can't hate Israel that much, Buchanan, can you?
39
posted on
02/21/2006 12:58:42 PM PST
by
elhombrelibre
(MSM: de facto allies of America's enemies.)
To: StAnDeliver
---I admire how Pat invoked Godwin's Law and autoflamed himself before half the article was over...---
Does Godwins law apply to Buchanan's critics? Or Newt?
40
posted on
02/21/2006 12:59:53 PM PST
by
RWE
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson