Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

P&O may have to retain port management-congressman
Reuters ^ | Tue Feb 21, 2006 9:51 PM GMT10

Posted on 02/21/2006 7:58:22 PM PST by demlosers

NEW YORK (Reuters) - British firm P&O (PO.L: Quote, Profile, Research) may have to retain management of six major ports in the United States even though it is on the verge of being taken over by Dubai Ports World, a U.S. congressman said on Tuesday.

Republican Rep. Peter King is one of a growing number of American legislators who oppose allowing state-controlled Dubai Ports World of the United Arab Emirates to manage American ports, citing security concerns. He plans to introduce legislation halting the deal next week.

"I think for the short-term the British company would probably have to stay on doing that (managing the ports, if the legislation is passed)," King, chairman of the House of Representatives Homeland Security Committee, told a news conference.

P&O shareholders last week approved Dubai Ports World's $6.8 billion takeover, which would create the world's third-largest ports group.

The deal has approval from U.S. regulators, and a British court is expected to give its final approval at a hearing scheduled for February 27.

But Republican and Democratic members of Congress have announced plans to stop the deal, under which Dubai Ports World would take over P&O's management of sea ports in New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia.

P&O stock soared since the firm said it was in talks about a possible takeover and a bidding war ensued, climbing more than 80 percent from October 31 to its intraday high of 563-2/4 pence on February 6.

The stock has slipped nearly 9 percent since then, closing at 514 pence on Tuesday, below the Dubai Ports World offer price of 520 pence.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: 109th; bds; dubaiportsworld; iran; israel; pando; peterking; po; uae
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 02/21/2006 7:58:25 PM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: demlosers

So much for all those free market capitalist consevatives...


2 posted on 02/21/2006 7:59:09 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Peter King is so full of sh!t on this one. I find myself wondering why the chairman of the House of Representatives Homeland Security Committee waited until mid-February 2006 to express his opposition to a corporate acquisition that was formally announced in November of 2005.


3 posted on 02/21/2006 8:05:51 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Leave a message with the rain . . . you can find me where the wind blows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
It reminds me of the mullahs coming out NOW against cartoons that came out months ago... ;)

Yes, I AM kidding, relax, King fans.

4 posted on 02/21/2006 8:09:14 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Sure they can still run it ... as Dubai Ports World or Dubai Ports International (as I saw them referred to in another article) or whatever they want to be called doesn't absorb them into themselves or another division.

Dubai Ports World home page http://www.dpiterminals.com/

They have terminal facilities in Asia, Latin America, Europe and West Africa.

I also saw a post where the port in the US was going to sign the contract anyway. The port authority is a local government entity. I guess Congress could void their contract. 

Seems the more we hear and see the more fractious and messier it's getting. 

 

5 posted on 02/21/2006 8:10:06 PM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
King never fails to run to the front of a parade, so that he might lead it.

Except when it came to the IRA. He finally felt enough political pressure to back away from hosting Gerry Adams.

6 posted on 02/21/2006 8:12:39 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: demlosers; SittinYonder

So a private company is going to be forced to NOT sell and forced to keep doing business as usual? By our government?


7 posted on 02/21/2006 8:14:41 PM PST by eyespysomething (Iran is like the slightly retarded cousin that keeps asking Santa for a shotgun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

That was probably around the time he realized that he had more illegal Mexican immigrants in his district than Irish-American voters.


8 posted on 02/21/2006 8:16:50 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Leave a message with the rain . . . you can find me where the wind blows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

How does that saying go... its better to remain quiet and look like a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.


9 posted on 02/21/2006 8:19:00 PM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
So much for all those free market capitalist consevatives

LOL, my husband and I were discussing this and he was amazed he hadn't heard a reporter ask, "Why are the British running our ports in the first place?"

10 posted on 02/21/2006 8:22:51 PM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Ive look a little closely at this and the hysteria on "port gate" is over-the-top. Much knee-jerking going on along with much grandstanding.
11 posted on 02/21/2006 8:34:43 PM PST by demlosers (Kerry: "Impeach Bush, filibuster Alito, withdraw from Iraq, send U235 to Iran, elect me President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Total knee jerk reaction brought on by the MSM that were looking to make waves by not reporting the story correctly in the first place, just like the NSA story.


12 posted on 02/21/2006 8:38:22 PM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
I agree with you on that.

This story was first posted here on FR back on the 10th or 11th of this month, and my one comment on that thread was that I knew they had gotten the facts wrong -- because P&O Ports didn't OWN any U.S. port facilities and therefore couldn't be selling them to a UAE-owned company.

13 posted on 02/21/2006 8:38:26 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Leave a message with the rain . . . you can find me where the wind blows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
We can't blame the MSM here, though. The ignorance of the so-called "conservative media" on this issue was astonishing.

Even after the story had been out there for a week, FreeRepublic was the only place where even a small number of people really knew the facts related to the proposed acquisition.

14 posted on 02/21/2006 8:40:23 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Leave a message with the rain . . . you can find me where the wind blows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
I think the options here are nationalize or get out of the way. We have a sale of one company to another company. If we do not like the sale, we nationalize the asset and turn its operation over to Haliburton.
15 posted on 02/21/2006 8:40:45 PM PST by Whispering Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
We can't blame the MSM here, though. The ignorance of the so-called "conservative media" on this issue was astonishing.

OK, i have to agree with you. Bill O'Reilly did a pretty good job explaining this on his show tonight.

16 posted on 02/21/2006 8:48:34 PM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

He must have a FreeRepublic screen name. LOL.


17 posted on 02/21/2006 8:51:20 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Leave a message with the rain . . . you can find me where the wind blows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
He must have a FreeRepublic screen name. LOL.

Trust me im no O'Reilly lover, plus you can check the American Idol live thread I was posting to that during his show. I just watched The Factor rerun. :D

18 posted on 02/21/2006 8:53:28 PM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

FYI.


19 posted on 02/21/2006 8:55:06 PM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

LOL.


20 posted on 02/21/2006 8:56:23 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Leave a message with the rain . . . you can find me where the wind blows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson