Posted on 02/23/2006 3:37:41 PM PST by Stellar Dendrite
LOL!!!!!!!!
Malkin suffers from the same thing that happens to so many talking heads when they move into the big time...she takes herself too seriously.
I like Michelle, she's cute and she's a logical, independent and informed thinker. This was a good post.
Quite true. But it isn't a "reward". To legally drive a car on the public roads, I have to have government approval, hence my driver's license. The little car with the bad picture in my wallet isn't a "reward".
Some of us reeeeealllly want to cut off our nose and both ears to spite our face.
The tactic is called "trend journalism". To portray a movement of opinion in a way one wishes it to move.
One of the canards is the "union" card to inflame anti-union folk, and to deflect attention from all the REpub criticism. Not at your link "Sister" makes a reference to union behind the push but that which she links to has no such statement.
the CARLYLE gang.
Gotta give Rush his props for not caving in to the hysteria.
Heck, pal, we don't want that. We just want lockstep with Bush.
I would like to take this opportunity to remind people that regardless of the issue that is being so passionately debated that WE HAVE RULES!!!!
The British company. They wanted to sell some stuff. Happens all the time.
Rep. Peter King, the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, who was one of the first big-name Republicans to break ranks with the administration over the deal? The Longshoremen's political committee donated $5,500 to the King campaign.
Senator Clinton's campaign took $4,500.
Senator Dodd, $2,500.
Congressman Fossella, $9,500.
Senator Boxer, $6,000.
Senator Lautenberg, $9,000.
Rep. Jerrold Nadler, a Democrat from New York who is another outspoken critic of the Dubai deal, has accepted $22,500 from the Longshoremen since March of 2000.
Senator Menendez, a leader of the opposition to the Dubai deal, has taken in fully $39,500 in campaign contributions from the Longshoremen's political action committee.
"Heck, pal, we don't want that. We just want lockstep with Bush."
You weren't around here during the Harriet Miers drama, were you?
I just want to cut off easy access.
Sure was. And I was around during the sale of the ports to COSCO. Quite a different reaction when Clinton was in office.
i have reservations about this deal but my question is, arab vessels do not call @ israeli ports(nscsa & usac), israeli carrier zim does not call @ mideast ports, does anybody know how this will affect the operations if the deal goes through...
You bet. We will certainly loose easy access to our Navy staging and logistics bases in the Middle East.
(That would be the nose, or at least one of the ears.)
But you didn't ping Laz!
I'll be damned if I let the media stampede me on this issue, especially when I find out that the whole flapdoodle has been orchestrated by the longshoremen, and when Tommy Franks supports this as he has had dealings with UAE intelligence and values their support.
Michelle Malkin specializes in stirring up xenophobia. I don't care if she is insulted by it and thinks that is spin; it is the truth. If she isn't ranting about immigration she is criticizing the President because he isn't anti-Arab enough.
Pfui. I don't think she is that great a writer, either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.