Skip to comments.
Victor Davis Hanson, just back from Iraq.
Radio Blogger ^
| February 24, 2006
| Hugh Hewitt
Posted on 02/25/2006 11:26:38 AM PST by Jeff Chandler
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Interesting interview with Victor Davis Hanson. Good counterpoint to William F. Buckley's doom and gloom.
To: Jeff Chandler
Buckley is here.
Hanson was there.
2
posted on
02/25/2006 11:30:25 AM PST
by
new yorker 77
(Conservatives who eat their own are a liberal's best friend.)
To: Jeff Chandler; sure_fine
If they can keep it from reverting to an islamic state, it might work. I don't think they're that strong, yet. Maybe one day. I hope I'm wrong.
To: Jeff Chandler
I already predicted this in my forthcoming book: "America's Victories: Why the U.S. Wins Wars and Will Win the War on Terror,"
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1595230211/qid=1139189351/sr=1-6/ref=sr_1_6/104-8051195-6435107?s=books&v=glance&n=283155
This one's gonna knock your socks off. Due out 5/18.
4
posted on
02/25/2006 11:33:05 AM PST
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of news)
To: new yorker 77
Buckley was, is, and shall continue to be a conservative leader. Vic is a historian with a focus on pre 300 BC Greece who thinks he can compare every historical event to that specific period of time. Mr. Buckley continues to be proven correct sometimes even years after his statements.
5
posted on
02/25/2006 11:34:10 AM PST
by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
To: billbears
Buckley is wrong.
He is justifying his wrong assertions with an irresponsible article.
Bitter, old and wrong is a sad state for Buckley.
He is a former leader.
6
posted on
02/25/2006 11:38:36 AM PST
by
new yorker 77
(Conservatives who eat their own are a liberal's best friend.)
To: Jeff Chandler
Frankly,my earlier optimism about Iraq has gone. I hope Mr Hanson is right,though.
7
posted on
02/25/2006 11:38:56 AM PST
by
Mears
(The Killer Queen-caviar and cigarettes.)
To: billbears
Perhaps you are correct...I would be interested in knowing some of Buckley's correct predictions which you mention.
Buckley is certainly entitled to his opinion, and he is entitled to have it considered seriously. My only gripe is that he gives a scathing critique of the current approach without providing much of an alternative option. As a conservative leader, that's also part of his burden.
If the constructive, hearts and minds, build schools, power and water works plan is a pipe dream, then what's the alternative other than to break out the hammer and tongs, and brace for full-scale barbarism?
To: Jeff Chandler
I've always thought that we will not win, nor will we lose, the War on Terror. The best we can hope for is to kill as many terrorists as we possibly can, like the arcade game Whack-A-Mole, as well as rooting out the cells. But the War on Terror will be won by moderate Muslims, who want to be part of the modern world. They are the ones who can defeat terrorism, by destroying the mindset of the terrorists. They need to make suicide bombing unacceptable to the Muslim community.
We can help and support them. They, with our assistance, can change the Middle East and the world.
This is another reason I've come around to favor the UAE port deal. We need to suport any pro-modern regime in the Middle East. We can't make their job impossible, especially if they've gone out of their way to help the War on Terror. Besides, anything the corrupt unions are against, I tend to be in favor of.
To: new yorker 77
My opinion of Buckley runs along the lines of yours.
10
posted on
02/25/2006 11:42:19 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(If you don't want to be lumped in with those who commit violence in your name, take steps to end it.)
To: DoughtyOne
I am not going to pile on Buckley, but the opinion of those so far away from Iraq are irresponsible.
140 killed in four days in sectarian violence in Iraq = CIVIL WAR.
190 Murders in the US during this same four day period = business as usual.
11
posted on
02/25/2006 11:44:54 AM PST
by
new yorker 77
(Conservatives who eat their own are a liberal's best friend.)
To: paul in cape
Bush-bots reporting for disinformation duty
12
posted on
02/25/2006 11:47:40 AM PST
by
STD
(Grab Your Ankles, I'm From the Gub'ment)
To: new yorker 77
Buckley has some points, but he speaks as if it's a done deal and others, like Hanson, etc., admit mistakes but think we can still win. I want to believe Hanson, but I don't have a lot of faith in the Iraqi people. I think most are hedging their bets, taking what they can from us while we're doling out the goodies, and they will turn on us as soon as we're not looking.
13
posted on
02/25/2006 11:50:05 AM PST
by
Inkie
(Attn Dems: Loose Lips Sink Ships -- but hey, I guess that's your goal))
To: new yorker 77
14
posted on
02/25/2006 11:57:24 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(If you don't want to be lumped in with those who commit violence in your name, take steps to end it.)
To: new yorker 77
140 killed in four days in sectarian violence in Iraq = CIVIL WAR.
190 Murders in the US during this same four day period = business as usual. Robert Kaplan addresses this very subject here.
15
posted on
02/25/2006 11:58:04 AM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(Peace Begins in the Womb)
To: Inkie
When the troops start acting like Buckley by preferring the shelter of the US and fail to reenlist to go back to Iraq, then Buckley's rant will make sense, but that has not happened.
The very people most in harms way choose to reenlist to go back to Iraq.
Volunteers for failure or folks steeped in a reality that now escapes the sheltered and pampered Buckley.
16
posted on
02/25/2006 12:01:24 PM PST
by
new yorker 77
(Conservatives who eat their own are a liberal's best friend.)
To: paul in cape
"But the War on Terror will be won by moderate Muslims, who want to be part of the modern world. They are the ones who can defeat terrorism, by destroying the mindset of the terrorists. They need to make suicide bombing unacceptable to the Muslim community."
We can help and support them."
First, you'll have to find them. Good luck.
17
posted on
02/25/2006 12:04:38 PM PST
by
adam_az
(It's the border, stupid!)
To: new yorker 77
I think Buckley's article is not directly stating defeat. He appears to be carefully couching the defeat based on what the expectations were before the engagement.
I could be wrong but I think he is leaving some wiggling room. And it's intentional.
18
posted on
02/25/2006 12:11:55 PM PST
by
romanesq
To: new yorker 77
Yes, I know that's a fact. A friend's son did three tours. When I thanked him for his service, he put his hand over his heart and said, "It's an honor." I could barely keep back the tears. He's a Marine.
19
posted on
02/25/2006 12:24:32 PM PST
by
Inkie
(Attn Dems: Loose Lips Sink Ships -- but hey, I guess that's your goal))
To: romanesq
You can't wiggle out of "FAILURE" in the headline.
20
posted on
02/25/2006 12:26:22 PM PST
by
new yorker 77
(Conservatives who eat their own are a liberal's best friend.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson