What?
So the state doesn't have a right to prohibit to say,
prohibit felons from voting while they are on parole?
Well perhaps with S. Dakota passing a ban on abortion, States Rights will be revisited again real soon
Well, perhaps with Californias passing a ban on 'assault weapons', States Rights will be revisited again real soon?
Don't hold your breath.
A state exercising its 'right to prohibit' is a problem in a free republic, not a solution.
What? So the state doesn't have a right to prohibit to say, prohibit felons from voting while they are on parole?
It becomes a problem, -- especially for instance when they prohibit ex-felons from owning guns, along with losing the vote.
States are delegated the power to reasonably regulate most aspects of our life, liberty or property, using due process of law. -- But fiat prohibitions are not due process.
Deprivation of Rights due to criminal prosecution is a far cry from a priori restraint of a law abiding citizens Rights.