Endorsements Go DeLay's Way, But His Opponents Maintain The Polls Don't [Campbell 48%; DeLay 38%]

Fort Bend Now ^ | 02.26.2006 | By Bob Dunn

[SolidSupplySide]

When I posted this data on the campaign signs in my neighborhood to SolidSupplySide then, he didn't comment on the difference in his neighborhood. He waited three days to do disclose it on another thread. Why hide that type of information if it's true? It would have been the *perfect* place to point out the disparity! (If the shoe was on the other foot, I wouldn't have been able to resist)!

You inspired me to count yard signs; I hadn't counted the yard signs until this weekend. I'm sorry that I didn't have anything to tell you at the time you posted. I really had no desire to drag up an old thread to post this information on.

I'll repeat what I said about yard signs. I think they are a very poor predictor for an election. The only thing worse than counting yard signs would be counting signs in the ROW. Using that standard, Campbell wins 100 to 1.

I think DeLay supporters are getting worried about this race. Their ugliness in general doesn't seem to reflect confidence.

[Michael Goldsberry]

What was the count?

[The Old Hoosier]

DeLay will crush Campbell, he's still peddling his two-month-old poll of 200 people.

[RedWhiteBlue]

15 DeLay, 2 for Campbell. If you notice, when I mentioned this 3 days ago, Campbell only had one sign in my subdivision, so his support has DOUBLED! Oh, DeLay should be running scared now! (<---- Campbell supporter logic)

[RedWhiteBlue]

The worst outcome would be for Lampson to win. That's why I support Campbell. Campbell has a better chance at winning the general election than DeLay does. As far as voting for DeLay . . . I haven't voted for him in 10 years. (I've mentioned this on many threads for many years; I don't try to hide it.)

That still doesn't answer my question, and you know it. I don't know why you are afraid to come right out and say it directly, but have to beat around the bush. You will never vote for Delay or Lampson, in other words: When DeLay wins the primary (or *if* DeLay wins the primary -- if that makes you feel better for it to be stated that way), you will either withhold your vote (or vote for Stockman) and thereby you will in effect be helping Lampson. Whether you want to help Lampson or not is *not relevant*; that will be the end result. And you'll be happy as long as the outcome is that Tom DeLay loses.

[RedWhiteBlue]

You inspired me to count yard signs

Well, thank you. I'm so flattered that you find me to be inspirational!

[fortheDeclaration]

Honestly, it appears your argument boils down to "We should support DeLay *because* he has been indicted." That is very strange.

So your reason to not vote for him is because you hold him to be unethical?

Proof?

I support Delay because he has been one of the few Republicans to play hardball with the Democrats (hence the legal attack against him).

If Campbell wins the primary I will vote for him.

My wife and I voted for Delay on Friday.

[DrewsDad]

Malaise is Prevalent in the Lampson Campaign

[flattorney]

I think DeLay supporters are getting worried about this race. Their ugliness in general doesn't seem to reflect confidence.
41 posted on 02/26/2006 7:19:02 PM PST by SolidSupplySide

Nor does your continued ignorance and spamming this forum with your anti-DeLay threads and banter reflect any confidence. - fla