Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Polygamist judge ordered removed from bench by Utah Supreme Court
The Peninsula Clarion ^ | 2/25/2006 | DEBBIE HUMMEL

Posted on 02/27/2006 2:19:51 PM PST by High Cotton

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: colorcountry

You cite ancient history. Polygamy was abolished before UT became a state and is against state and federal law.


21 posted on 02/28/2006 11:40:10 AM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl

Well isn't that convenient! Oh boy, it is a good thing that God spoke when he did!

The federal government began its efforts to force the abandonment of polygamy on July 1, 1862. The Anti-bigamy Act defined the illegality of polygamy, but it was not really enforced for another 20 years. In 1882 the government enacted what was known as the Edmunds law. This provision "made the 'cohabiting' with more than one woman a crime, punishable by a fine not to exceed three hundred dollars, and by imprisonment not to exceed six months. This law also rendered persons who were living in polygamy, or who believed in its rightfulness, incompetent to act as grand or petit jurors; and also disqualified all polygamists for voting or holding office" (B. H. Roberts, Outlines of Ecclesiastical History, p.437). Five years later the Edmunds-Tucker Act became law. Its effects on the LDS Church proved to be the most devastating and are described in volume 5, page 320 of Messages of the First Presidency:

"During the entire period of the presidency of John Taylor, 1880 to 1887, relentless prosecution of men who had entered into the relationship of plural marriage was intensified.

"Under the provisions of the Edmunds-Tucker law the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was disincorporated, the Perpetual Emigration Fund Company was dissolved, and all property belonging to the Church, with the exception of buildings used exclusively for religious worship, was escheated to the government.

"Hundreds of men who had contracted plural marriages were heavily fined, and imprisoned. All persons who could not subscribe to a test oath which was provided especially for those who practiced or believed in the practice of plural marriage, were disfranchised.

"It became obvious that no human power could prevent the disintegration of the Church, except upon a pledge by its members to obey the laws which had been enacted prohibiting the practice of polygamy.

"It was under these circumstances that Wilford Woodruff was sustained as President of the Church, in April, 1889.


22 posted on 02/28/2006 11:43:28 AM PST by colorcountry (Lead me not into temptation. I can find it myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus; Utah Girl

Many fundamentalist LDS groups are still following Brigham Young's admonition. They view the current LDS position as proof that the Utah Mormons have denied the faith since the LDS Church excommunicates any member who marries more than one wife at a time. This is not to say that plural marriage is a dead issue in the Utah Church.

It appears that the monogamous relationship currently stressed by the LDS Church is but a brief interlude before polygamy commences again. As Bruce McConkie wrote on page 578 of Mormon Doctrine, "Obviously the holy practice will commence again after the Second Coming of the Son of Man and the ushering in of the millennium."

I hope you guys are ready to welcome "sister wives," the day is coming.


23 posted on 02/28/2006 12:00:49 PM PST by colorcountry (Lead me not into temptation. I can find it myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

People can either believe latter day revelation exists or not. If it does, which we as members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints do, then we do believe that Wilford Woodruff petitioned the Lord in prayer about polygamy. And received the answer.


24 posted on 02/28/2006 5:03:14 PM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson