Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Missile purchase to upset region
The Australian ^ | March 01, 2006 | Cameron Stewart

Posted on 02/28/2006 5:31:29 PM PST by Piefloater

AUSTRALIA'S F/A-18 fighters will be armed with the most lethal long-range cruise missiles in the region, a move likely to upset our Asian neighbours.

In a controversial decision, the federal Government announced yesterday that it had chosen to buy the most deadly of the three cruise missile types it was examining to help offset the looming retirement of the F-111 strike bombers.

The decision to choose the longer-range Joint Air-To-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) will be seen by Indonesia as provocative, given that Jakarta has previously warned that such missiles could trigger a regional arms race.

The Lockheed Martin JASSM was by far the most deadly of the three missiles being considered by Australia.

The 909kg missiles, which cost about $544,000 each, are described by the US Air Force as having a "kick-the-door-down capability".

With a range of more than 400km - four times that of any missile currently available to the RAAF - it will be the first self-guided land-attack stealth cruise missile in Southeast Asia when itis introduced from late 2009. The Government did not say how many missiles it would buy but the total cost is likely to be about $350million.

The RAAF also plans to use the missile on the new Joint Strike Fighter when it arrives from 2013.

With only one air-to-air refuel, a JSF armed with JASSM could hit targets as far north as Thailand. With repeated mid-air refuelling, it could strike anywhere in Asia.

The issue is a sensitive one with Jakarta, which has questioned the need for cruise missiles capable of striking any part of Indonesia.

In 2004, when The Australian broke news of the plan to buy cruise missiles, an Indonesian Foreign Ministry spokesman said the idea "may not be construed by some countries as defensive".

"Australia's Government has, until now, been against the proliferation of advanced missile technologies in the region. There is a risk that raising the level of sophistication could lead to some kind of counter response," the spokesman said at the time.

However, Defence Minister Brendan Nelson yesterday played down the impact of the new missiles.

"The acquisition of long-range missiles does not represent a change in Australia's defence posture and capability planning," Dr Nelson said.

The decision to fit cruise missiles on the RAAF's 71 F/A-18s has been forced on the Government by the looming retirement of the long-range F-111 strike bombers from 2010.

With the F-111's replacement - the JSF - not due to arrive until 2013, the Government is facing at least three years without a potent air-strike capability.

The fitting of JASSM to the shorter-range F/A-18 fighters is aimed at boosting their strike capabilities in the interim years.

"The introduction and fitting of the JASSM to the F/A-18 Hornet provides an important capability for Defence and forms a key part of the Government's plan to withdraw the F-111 aircraft," Dr Nelson said.

"The acquisition is a prudent decision to ensure Australia retains its strike capability so Australian objectives can be met whilst maintaining the safety of aircraft and crews."

The Government said it had abandoned plans to fit cruise missiles to the AP-3C Orion.


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand
KEYWORDS: armsbuildup; missiles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
At $544,000 per missile, $350 million is going to buy a lot of long range cruise missiles even allowing for the inevitable other costs associated with this type of purchase. So is this provocative or just plain good planning?
1 posted on 02/28/2006 5:31:30 PM PST by Piefloater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Piefloater
I would think anyone with a brain would be smart enough not to mess with the Aussies but one never knows. As several people have said in the past,

If you would have peace, be prepared for war."

2 posted on 02/28/2006 5:34:10 PM PST by MNJohnnie ("Good men don't wait for the polls. They stand on principle and fight."-Soul Seeker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Piefloater
"The decision to choose the longer-range Joint Air-To-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) will be seen by Indonesia as provocative"

More provacative than the bombing of the Australian night club in Bali ?

3 posted on 02/28/2006 5:34:58 PM PST by SENTINEL (USMC GWI (MY GOD IS GOD, ROCKCHUCKER !!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Piefloater

The question is: what does Indonesia have planned for Australia that it doesn't want Australia to be able to stop?


4 posted on 02/28/2006 5:36:43 PM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Piefloater

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/jassm.htm


5 posted on 02/28/2006 5:37:50 PM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Piefloater

I don't think I knew that the hornet could launch cruise missiles. Seems rather inefficient, but I am sure someone here will correct me in a most caustic way ; )


6 posted on 02/28/2006 5:38:10 PM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Once the get the JSF, they will be hot. Look out China.


7 posted on 02/28/2006 5:46:00 PM PST by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Piefloater

Big deal if asia gets mad. The aussies have a right to arm themselves to defend what is theirs.Jassm is brutal and they are really no way of detecting it before it is up on you. By then its to late.


8 posted on 02/28/2006 5:46:46 PM PST by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Piefloater
The asians surrounding the continent of Australia have nothing to fear from this weapon-phobic lousy excuse for a nation that confiscated guns from its citizens. They just need to kick down the door and walk right in...!
9 posted on 02/28/2006 5:48:59 PM PST by brainstem223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Walkingfeather
Even an f-16 can carry four of these things at a time.

Range 2400 miles. Full stealth.

10 posted on 02/28/2006 5:57:06 PM PST by SENTINEL (USMC GWI (MY GOD IS GOD, ROCKCHUCKER !!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GeorgefromGeorgia

See some strategy here? Closer ties with India. Better weapons for Australia, a watchful peace with Russia, bases in Afganistan, Iraq and the 'stans. One is curious if someones in our Govt is not smarter then we think. Sure looks like some cagey longer term positioning...


11 posted on 02/28/2006 6:03:08 PM PST by MNJohnnie ("Good men don't wait for the polls. They stand on principle and fight."-Soul Seeker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: brainstem223
weapon-phobic lousy excuse for a nation that confiscated guns from its citizens

Huh?

Australia: Gun Ownership Explodes

12 posted on 02/28/2006 6:09:16 PM PST by Piefloater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The question is: what does Indonesia have planned for Australia that it doesn't want Australia to be able to stop?

The Indonesian Military is basically completely helpless. Think, say, the Iraqi regular Army in 1991, but a lot worse.

13 posted on 02/28/2006 6:45:12 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Piefloater
Another arms race across the world. Excellent. (sarc.)
14 posted on 02/28/2006 6:45:43 PM PST by Fishing-guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Piefloater

Australia confiscated many weapons just a few years ago after that crazy shot some tourists in Tasmania. Aussies are pretty much disarmed.


15 posted on 02/28/2006 6:48:55 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SENTINEL

WOW, clarification? 2400 miles including the range of the f-16? or 2400 miles on their own? That seems like a freaking huge range that we could launch them land based from a base and hit about anywhere in the world.
But geography is not my strong point.


16 posted on 02/28/2006 7:02:09 PM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Piefloater
The old SAC motto "Peace Through Strength" never more relevant in todays world.Go Aussies.
17 posted on 02/28/2006 7:03:12 PM PST by Apercu ("Res ipsa loquitur")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Piefloater
With the Chinese on their backs, maybe they should consider an even more lethal cruise missile;
18 posted on 02/28/2006 7:06:08 PM PST by FreeAtlanta (Join FR Team 36120 at http://folding.stanford.edu {Protein Folding Project})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Walkingfeather

They can be nuclear equiped as well :)


19 posted on 02/28/2006 7:07:12 PM PST by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

They're still flying the F 111 ?


20 posted on 02/28/2006 7:14:38 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson