Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Missile purchase to upset region
The Australian ^ | March 01, 2006 | Cameron Stewart

Posted on 02/28/2006 5:31:29 PM PST by Piefloater

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Walkingfeather
Crap, I was off a line in the chart.

The UASF is buying 2400 missiles, the range is not available. Sorry.

21 posted on 02/28/2006 7:40:52 PM PST by SENTINEL (USMC GWI (MY GOD IS GOD, ROCKCHUCKER !!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SENTINEL

No problem, I thought that range was a wee bit much. Any idea if the tactical tomahawk is up and going?


22 posted on 02/28/2006 7:47:18 PM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Piefloater

I'm surprised that anyone takes Indonesia seriously. Their Armed Forces are even more corrupt than the country over all, and that is saying a lot.

However, they are stratgically spread out over key shipping lanes and could raise a fuss with some of their own missiles, if they had them.

It could be they are posturing to buy some of their own as way to gain military and diplomatic leverage in the region.


23 posted on 02/28/2006 8:06:03 PM PST by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Australia confiscated many weapons just a few years ago after that crazy shot some tourists in Tasmania. Aussies are pretty much disarmed.

No, we're not.

Australia's state governments with the support of the Federal government did impose stricter licencing procedures on the ownership of all but basic firearms following the Port Arthur massacre. But Australians who were willing to get the necessary new licences, typically had few problems keeping their firearms at that time. In a collossal waste of money, the government purchased many unused but legal firearms from gun owners who chose to voluntarily surrender weapons in exchange for cash. A small number of people, often those with old criminal convictions which did not prevent them having basic firearms licences but did prevent them having higher level licences, were forced to surrender their more powerful weapons. Another small number had to surrender weapons which were not cleared under the new laws.

But many more Australians kept their firearms. And many more have purchased them in recent years. There are millions of legally held firearms in private hands in Australia. We're not disarmed.

The post-Port Arthur gun laws were wrongheaded and largely pointless. But they really didn't do that much damage, they just added a new layer of bureaucracy to an already top heavy administration.

24 posted on 03/01/2006 12:58:12 AM PST by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Iran and China are the mostobvious reasons for this sort of strategic positioning. North Korea too and Pakistan too if Musharraf gets overthrown by islamists.


25 posted on 03/01/2006 1:07:24 AM PST by Paul_Denton (Every single troll is now an enemy of the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Walkingfeather

The Hornets have been carrying & launching the SLAM & SLAM-ER for years now.


26 posted on 03/01/2006 3:50:52 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SENTINEL

Though there is nothing on the official range of the JASSM(or any other US weapon),some websites state it as being above 350kms(220 miles).


27 posted on 03/01/2006 3:53:44 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Note to self. Go out to garage look under F/18 wings, see if you notice big hangie thingies under them.


28 posted on 03/01/2006 6:42:59 AM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975
Good to hear.

Stalin, the tyrant of Russia and savvy military marshal, observed that anyone intent on invading America with massive armies would be dismayed by the thought of 90 million snipers waiting for him. There are twice that number now. Any invading army would be decimated and made non-functional fairly quickly. They might push through to the Mississippi on the initial attack, but they would suffer the same fate as the German panzers at Stalingrad: they would cease to exist.

Seems a similar fate awaits an army invading Australia.

29 posted on 03/01/2006 10:10:07 AM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
If the USA is invaded by a foreign army, it better not come through the South. It reminded me of a story told by a former Captain (Army) at Monti Cassino in Italy. The only way we managed to take to old monastery was to bring up a National Guard Division from Oklahoma/Texas. All the soldiers were such good sharpshooters that they kept the Germans heads down while the rest of the Army took the hill.
30 posted on 03/01/2006 12:53:54 PM PST by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GeorgefromGeorgia

The invaders might try entry through Alaska. Of the 600,000 population, half are retired military, only 100,000 are qualified sharpshooters but the rest are working on it.


31 posted on 03/01/2006 1:01:27 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson