Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldFriend
It's better to keep high blood pressure, diabetes, heart problems under control rather than the alternative of hospitalization.

So why is, for example, Viagra covered?

And frankly, ignoring the quality of life is not unimportant.

Better "quality of life" does not "mitigate the spending down the line." Why should I pay for someone else's "quality of life?"

63 posted on 03/01/2006 9:03:52 AM PST by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: OldFriend
Still awaiting your reply:

It's better to keep high blood pressure, diabetes, heart problems under control rather than the alternative of hospitalization.

So why is, for example, Viagra covered?

And frankly, ignoring the quality of life is not unimportant.

Better "quality of life" does not "mitigate the spending down the line." Why should I pay for someone else's "quality of life?"

76 posted on 03/01/2006 2:01:24 PM PST by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson