Skip to comments.Magma On The Move Beneath Yellowstone
Posted on 03/02/2006 6:29:40 AM PST by Founding Father
Much of Yellowstone National Park is a giant collapsed volcano, or caldera. In an enormous eruption roughly 640,000 years ago, this volcano spit out around 240 cubic miles of rock, dirt, magma and other material. Around 70,000 years ago, its last eruption filled in that gaping hole with flows of lava. Since then the area has enjoyed an uneasy peace, the land alternately rising and falling with the passing decades. New satellite data indicate that this uplift and subsidence is caused by the movement of magma beneath the surface and may explain why the northern edge of the park continues to rise while the southern part of the caldera is falling.
Charles Wicks, Daniel Dzurisin and their colleagues at the U.S. Geological Survey studied radar images of the caldera captured by the European Space Agency's ERS-2 satellite during two passes over the park. Using a technique called interferometry--whereby radar measurements from two different vantage points are combined to give a measure of height--the scientists confirmed measurements on the ground that showed the land rising. But the images also revealed that a roughly 12-mile-wide circle of land centered at the northern rim of the caldera is still rising while land to its south is sinking. The source of that uplift, according to data revealed in today's Nature, lies more than seven miles underground.
Therefore, magma movement must be the cause of the rise and fall, Dzurisin explains. "It's just too deep to be caused by pressurization of the hydrothermal system," he says. "A small amount of magma has either moved up or been intruded to a depth of [seven miles] or perhaps it was already there and it's been pressurized."
Although previous studies had hinted at new magma moving beneath Yellowstone, this represents the first compelling evidence, according to Dzurisin. Such magma movement would also explain recent surface phenomena like new cracksand hot springs, and the more frequent eruption of Steamboat Geyser. "If you do pressurize or increase the volume of a source [seven miles] deep, you put the ground in tension and that would be conducive to new fractures giving access to the surface for hot waters that previously hadn't had that access," he adds.
This new magma does not mean that Yellowstone will erupt again in the near future; much more significant signs such as more earthquakes, more focused ground deformations and the escape of volcanic gases would point to that. But it does point to continued activity at one of the world's largest volcanic systems. "We don't know if the next event will be a continuation of the series of lava flows that filled in the caldera or the beginning of a new cycle that will create a new caldera," Dzurisin says. "Eruptions are far enough apart that there is a very low probability of the next eruption happening in our lifetimes or anytime soon. The flipside is: the system has been active for millions of years and it's going to erupt again sometime." --David Biello
...this volcano spit out around 240 cubic miles of rock, dirt, magma and other material.
You beat me to it!
Thanks for the ping.
FReepmail me to be added or removed to the ECO-PING list!
Interesting stuff. When it blows it will be part of the Bush conspiracy and global warming!!
If Steamboat starts erupting regularly, I may have to figure out how to get there to see it.
HA!...in the movie it's right about the time the 'expert' makes this statement against the hero/'heroette' factual discoveries that they can get no 'politician' to listen to...that the lid blows and a tidal wave of lava consumes the nay sayers....
Luckily their pets escape unharmed and the hero gets the 'heroette'...whose lawyer consumes all his 'eartly' possession in divorce court... 10 yrs later...
Bush probably had Carl and Dick set this scenario up some ten thousand years ago. Now it is time to push the button.
Yes, I've read on a similiar thread that the energy produced from Yellowstone can supply the Western U.S. for decades.
The magma is, has been, and will be on the move.
Just look at the Hawaiian island chain. Newest at the end of the chain. Watzup? Must be on the move.
No argument from me about that. Volcanoes don't always have fault lines, but it would be cool to name one after George Bush. It might confuse the liberals even further.
ROTFL. I live 100 miles east of the park, and go over all of the time. I also write on Yellowsotne chat lines and they most assuredly would have a melt down at the suggestion. It would be a double meltdown if it slowed down the wolves, grizzlies, or buffalo!
"I want sharks with freaking laser beams on their heads!"
heh heh heh
We are Doomed. DOOMED!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We could build geothermal energy plants for the next 200 years nonstop and not affect the geology of the magma chamber in any measurable way.
If it were to blow Louis Farakhan will say that Cheney and Bush were behind it and Chris Matthews will go wall-to-wall with video about Bush being warned and how its all this Administrations fault.
"bump for later" :-)
Should the Army Corps of Engineers begin building the levees now?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.