Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US critics slam Indo-US nuke deal
Indiaaaj.com/Reuters ^ | Friday March 3 2006 | staff

Posted on 03/03/2006 12:22:19 AM PST by saganite

WASHINGTON: US critics accused President George W Bush of selling out weapons non-proliferation goals in order to close a landmark nuclear deal with New Delhi, hardening battle lines as the US Congress prepares to debate its fate.

Congress and the 44-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group must both approve the agreement, which would allow India, after three decades of pariah status, access to billions of dollars in US and other foreign atomic technology and fuel to meet its soaring energy needs.

Although many US lawmakers favor closer ties with the world's largest democracy, non-proliferation advocates said details that had so far emerged suggest Bush gave away too much in the nuclear agreement in an effort to ensure a successful summit with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi.

Democratic Rep. Edward Markey of Massachusetts said the accord “undermines the security not only of the United States, but of the rest of the world.”

With one simple move the president has blown a hole in the nuclear rules that the entire world has been playing by and broken his own word to assure that we will not ship nuclear technology to India without the proper safeguards,” said Markey, co-chair of the bi-partisan task force on non-proliferation.

Daryl Kimball of the Arms Control Association faulted the White House for a “rush to meet artificial deadlines (that) sold out core non-proliferation values” in favor of a deal that would “implicitly endorse, if not indirectly assist, the further growth of India's nuclear arsenal.”

Until Thursday's deal, Washington and New Delhi were divided on how India will separate its military and civilian nuclear plants, opening the latter to international inspections as a hedge against weapons proliferation.

Officials said India agreed to list 14 of its 22 reactors as civilian and open them to international inspection.

But experts said the fast-breeder reactors - a major sticking point in negotiations - appeared to be exempt, or at most inspections would be at India's discretion, and many more facilities - research reactors, reprocessing facilities and spent fuel stockpiles - also look to be excluded from safeguards.

“It's a sweetheart deal for India ... The administration told Congress the agreement would be about the growth of India's electricity and not the growth of Indian bomb making potential and that standard clearly has not been met,” said Michael Krepon of the Henry L Stimson Center.

Rep. Ed Royce of California, chairman of the House subcommittee on international terrorism and non-proliferation and a member of Bush's Republican party, said there is enthusiastic support in Congress for growing Indo-US ties.

“However, the Indo-US agreement on civil nuclear cooperation has implications beyond Indo-US relations. In this process, the goal of curbing nuclear proliferation should be paramount. Congress will continue its careful consideration of this far-reaching agreement,” Royce said.

Bush, at a news conference, acknowledged the agreement will be difficult to sell to Congress but was confident he could defend it as being in US interests.

Ron Somers, president of the Indo-US Business Council, which is leading a lobbying campaign on behalf of the nuclear agreement, said by telephone from New Delhi there is no question Congress supports deepening ties with India. But asked whether the deal can win legislative approval, he said “we must succeed. This is too important not to succeed.”


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; india; indianukes; indiavisit; nuclear; nuclearfuelcycle
Expect this to be the next Democratic talking point to prove their foreign policy and security credentials. You can expect to hear them claim Bush gave away all our nuke secrets and compromised our security.
1 posted on 03/03/2006 12:22:20 AM PST by saganite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: saganite

Abandon nukes, China tells India


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1588632/posts


2 posted on 03/03/2006 12:25:48 AM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Oh gee, I bet you're right.


3 posted on 03/03/2006 12:29:19 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite
It's all part of the UN nuclear fuel cycle plan of NPT reform. Iran is in play (meaning they will be able to hoodwink the UN and develop nuke weapons) and also the US is going to see some UN oversight as well.
4 posted on 03/03/2006 12:33:55 AM PST by endthematrix (None dare call it ISLAMOFACISM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

headline:
U.S. Critics slam everything U.S. does


5 posted on 03/03/2006 12:40:09 AM PST by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite
US critics slam Indo-US nuke deal

The only surprise is if anyone is deeply concerned with what "US critics" say. As far as I'm concerned, the Left has adequately proved that they don't really care about what is good or best...they are simply interested in power and will say and do anything at any cost to obtain it. Their words have become nothing more than a clanging background noise with no effect other than to annoy.

6 posted on 03/03/2006 12:41:11 AM PST by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Good grief. It didn't take these idiots long to forget about Dubai, did it?


7 posted on 03/03/2006 12:46:10 AM PST by WestVirginiaRebel (Islamofascists don't need cartoons. They're already caricatures.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Gee whiz...

All this riot over a country that is friendly to the United States, while reactions over Iran's nuclear program elicit only the occasional outburst, and that not even from the people criticizing this deal with India.


8 posted on 03/03/2006 12:52:49 AM PST by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

"Mind your own business, and set your own house in order first". India tells the Chinese.


9 posted on 03/03/2006 1:14:31 AM PST by MimirsWell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MimirsWell

India's Leftists and Communists, who otherwise don't miss a chance to blame "American influence" in India's affairs, give an eerie silence to this overtly perverted call from China to dismantle India's nuclear deterrence against China.

B@stards. If I had it my way, I'd see each one of them dipped slowly into a tank of concentrated acid. And allowed to heal. And dipped again. Allowed to heal...


10 posted on 03/03/2006 1:19:16 AM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: saganite
"US critics accused President George W Bush of ..."


ZZZ ... zzzzzz ... ZZZZZZ ... zzzzzzzzz ... ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ






11 posted on 03/03/2006 3:35:27 AM PST by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite
My guess is that at least part of the calculation here is that this will move India more into our corner when push comes to shove with Taiwan and Iran, and I hope the White House is correct on this score.

If nothing else, then this at least will help even out our trade imbalance with India. ;-)

12 posted on 03/03/2006 4:03:34 AM PST by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick; Gengis Khan; Srirangan; sukhoi-30mki

These people are Democrats bribed by Chinese lobbyists. Democrats seems to be pro-China, as you have seen during the Clinton administration.


13 posted on 03/03/2006 5:30:39 AM PST by Wiz (News hyaena providing you news with spice of acid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson