Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tonycavanagh
Iraq was considered a threat because they had or may of had WMD. Iraq is no longer the threat as we know occupy Iraq.

You just contradicted yourself.

35 posted on 03/06/2006 4:16:28 AM PST by Coop (FR= a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Coop
re :You just contradicted yourself.

No I didn't either debate or don't. I noticed you mention 1 and 2 while conveniently ignoring 3 and 4

1) Iraq was considered a threat because they had or may of had WMD.

2) Iraq is no longer the threat as we now occupy Iraq.

3)But where is the WMD, they are not in our custody.

4)They are still out there and therefore still a threat. Therefore where WMD is concerned we failed in our mission and I will add a 5.

5)Before we moved into Iraq a major reason for removing WMD from this theater was the fact that Saddam may hand them over to a terrorist organisation to use against us.

Since we do not know who now controls them, and if all of them are controlled by the same organistion we have not removed the threat of them falling into terrorist hands and may have increased the chances of that possibility.

37 posted on 03/06/2006 5:56:50 AM PST by tonycavanagh (We got plenty of doomsayers where are the truth sayers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson