To: tallhappy
This translates to 1,849,204 gallons of gasoline. I would imagine the US cattle industry is much, much larger. Hmmmmmm......
God I'd love to say to the ragheads : "Oh, sorry, we don't need your oil. We'd rather use COW DUNG."
9 posted on
03/03/2006 12:18:34 PM PST by
domenad
(In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
To: domenad
God I'd love to say to the ragheads : "Oh, sorry, we don't need your oil. We'd rather use COW DUNG." That'd be pretty fantastic.
12 posted on
03/03/2006 12:20:03 PM PST by
tallhappy
(Juntos Podemos!)
To: domenad
God I'd love to say to the ragheads : "Oh, sorry, we don't need your oil. We'd rather use COW DUNG." It would be funnier and more ironic if we used pig dung.
22 posted on
03/03/2006 12:24:00 PM PST by
Lekker 1
("Computers in the future may have only 1000 vacuum tubes..." - Popular Mechanics, March 1949)
To: domenad
God I'd love to say to the ragheads : "Oh, sorry, we don't need your oil. We'd rather use COW DUNG."I think you meant "sheet heads" . . . . .and it would be infinitely sweeter to use pork poo.
To: domenad
This translates to 1,849,204 gallons of gasoline If you are using the 500,000 metric tons (551,155 U.S. tons) of cattle dung that was per year. The US uses that much gasoline about every 7 minutes. That is Finished Motor Gasoline only. We use that many gallions of oil in a little over 3 minutes.
I don't think even Washington D.C. produces enough B.S. to be noticeable.
Product Supplied, EIA
65 posted on
03/03/2006 1:24:59 PM PST by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson