Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where are the Peaceniks on the crimes of Islamic Republic?
Persian Journal ^ | 3/4/06 | Shirin Neshat

Posted on 03/04/2006 1:23:30 PM PST by freedom44

The organization StopWarOnIran.org and its circulating petition of protest against a possible war between the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) regime and the West, is yet another example of the Pink/Red portion of the constituency that contributed to the overthrow of Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi in 1979. Mr. Ramsey Clark, the former United States Attorney General, who in the best tradition of American humorist Will Rogers has never met a Leftist or Communist he didn't like, has re-emerged as a spearhead of this latest attack upon the Persian Monarchy and the memory of the Shah. Worse yet, Mr. Clark and his fellow-travelers have maintained a complete silence regarding the criminal character of the IRI regime, and its continuing assault upon the human rights of the men, women, and children of Iran--a record which includes the murder of independent journalists, the assassination of political dissidents at home and abroad, the systematic denial of the rights of Iranian women, the routine torture and execution of minors, the employment of the tenets of Islamic fundamentalist theocracy to destroy the foundations of a Constitutional Republic rooted in democratic freedom of expression, and now the "election" of Mr. Ahmadinejad last summer as President--a personal participant in mass murder as an especially zealous past member of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), who now struts his credentials as a Holocaust denier and one committed to "wiping Israel off the map."

And the distorted history of the Pahlavi era in Iran presented by StopWarOnIran.org and its petition cannot be corrected in a single letter. I would simply refer those interested in the real history of this era to the Shah's final memoirs in his book, Answer to History. Can anyone believe that a fair reading of the history of Iran between 1953 and 1978, whatever its shortcomings and failures, can possibly be compared to what Islamic fundamentalism has wrought in our Nation for the last 27 years?

But even more important for the luminaries who serve as signatories for this petition--ranging from QueerJustice.org to the Communist Party, USA of Wisconsin--the following question must be asked: What would the fate of these Leftists and Reds be if they resided in the Islamic Republic of the Mullahs? The alliance of Red (Communist) and Black (Islamic Mullahs) which overthrew the Shah in 1979 had its primary Marxist component in the form of the Mujaheddin-e-Khalq (MKO) terrorist organization. But once the Mullahs were triumphant, what happened to the MKO and its sympathizers in post-Revolutionary Iran at the hands of the Islamic theocrats? The answer to this should be a wake-up call to Mr. Clark and his allies to re-examine their own strategy and motives in giving the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) regime a free pass from the critical standards they seem to apply exclusively to the Shah's reign--which itself ended at the hands of a conspiracy of British Petroleum, the Ball/Brezinzski crowd at the Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderberg Group in 1978 which ushered in the reign of terror of Khomeini as a chosen tool of the global corporate interests Mr. Clark claims to oppose. This last fact is also conveniently ignored by the other denizens of StopWarOnIran.org.

Now I freely admit that war between the United States and Iran is frought with risk and potential tragedy beyond human comprehension, including the danger of a mushrooming expansion of such a conflict into a 3rd World War. I also acknowledge that American conservatives like Pat Buchanan and my friend, Mark Dankof, have also sounded the alarm on the dangers of the use of a preemptive military policy against Iran. But it is equally true that the deterioration of the situation between the West and Iran which might end in such a cataclysm is the direct result of a collective policy of wholesale appeasement of the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) on the part of Western governments, mass media, and academics. This is the central truth of the matter that has now resulted in the present diplomatic standoff and impasse. And had this policy of appeasement been replaced with one of principled, unified opposition to the Mullahs and their sick ideology over a period of many years, the Islamic Republic of Iran would have already been consigned to the ashheap of history. The people of Iran would be free. The world would not be faced with the terrible choice of either preemptive war or nuclear capability in the hands of a cabal of corrupt religious fanatics. There would be a regime in place in Iran which reaffirms the Monarchy with the accompanying foundational vision for human rights which characterized Cyrus the Great and the Achaemenids, along with a freely elected Majlis and Prime Minister operating under the 1906 Constitution of Iran.

Finally, do Mr. Ramsey Clark and his ilk want Islamic fundamentalists who believe in the totalitarian Doctrine of the Jurisprudent to possess the capability to manufacture a nuclear weapon? And if such a capability is attained--and later used--by the Mullahs, will the resulting mass death and destruction to the innocent of the world not be the primary moral fault of those who turned a blind eye and deaf ear to the crimes of Islamic theocracy, and who failed to implement a collective global policy of economic and political blockade of such a criminal regime by the world's civilized governments as an alternative to what now seems to be an inevitable war?

Oh, yes. There is another question on my part. What are the significant international sources of funding for StopWarOnIran.org? Arab regimes? Russia? Communist China? Others? Will they be fairly identified? Or will they continue to operate in the darkest of shadows as they did 27 years ago?


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 03/04/2006 1:23:32 PM PST by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freedom44
"StopWarOnIran.org"

They already started the party and didn't invite me????

Damn it!!!!
2 posted on 03/04/2006 1:29:29 PM PST by stm (It's possible to fix most things, but you can't fix stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
Islamic Republic

Somebody should contact that site's owner, J'Imrah bin Zihn.

3 posted on 03/04/2006 1:33:54 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Did you say Jimma bin Kahta?


4 posted on 03/04/2006 1:34:57 PM PST by stm (It's possible to fix most things, but you can't fix stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

"stop Jihad Now!"


5 posted on 03/04/2006 1:43:26 PM PST by Paladin2 (If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

These "pleasethenogoodniks are often confused with the peaceniks.


6 posted on 03/04/2006 1:47:12 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Diversity is a means to our end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

Their silence, as always in these matters, is deafening.


7 posted on 03/04/2006 1:48:53 PM PST by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: freedom44

WHERE ARE THE PEACENIKS ON THE CRIMES OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC?

Greenpeace, all the SPIRGs, the Animal Rights gang, the ACLU and all their Commie buddies, Planned Parenthood, the Right to Die crowd, Man-Boy Love, all the Peaceniks everywhere, the porn peddlars, and now the Islamic Jihadists are clumping together to create a solid front to further each of their agendas. They are funded by the same people who support all the above orgs. So what happens when (God help us all) those agendas are attained? ARMAGEDDON!


9 posted on 03/04/2006 1:54:35 PM PST by Paperdoll (On the cutting edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44


The middle east is the only place in the world where a dictatorship can be called a Republic.


10 posted on 03/04/2006 2:16:23 PM PST by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

Well, you see the Left is not about to criticize the Islamic Republic for the same reasons that NOW was silent during the Taliban:
1. Reflexive sympathy for any entity that is hostile to the United States.
2. These regimes may be against abortion, oppress women, have inequities in wealth distribution, no free press, etc. But they are practicing an equally valid alternate lifestyle that we should not judge or even be so impolite as to notice -- especially if paying attention to such abject oppression might necessitate doing something about it.

Can't we all just get along? We're just as bad, if not worse really.


11 posted on 03/04/2006 2:47:07 PM PST by walford (http://the-big-pic.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll

So what happens when (God help us all) those agendas are attained?

Not going to happen so long as I draw breath, and can hold a gun.


12 posted on 03/04/2006 3:12:29 PM PST by gafusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: walford; freedom44; gafusa

>Why can't we all just get along?<

What a whimpy answer, and virtually impossible, walford. Wake up - the bad guys are winning! The lefists, no matter who they are afilliated with, especially the Jihadists, do not "want to get along". They want total, repressive control and death to those who won't cooperate.
Thank God for people like gafusa, who would fight for his country and his beliefs. Problem is, gafusa, we, too, need to organize.


13 posted on 03/04/2006 4:39:50 PM PST by Paperdoll (On the cutting edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll
>Why can't we all just get along?<

What a w[h]impy answer, and virtually impossible, walford. Wake up - the bad guys are winning!


Perhaps you should 'wake-up' and read the rest of my post to see the intention behind that remark. By all means, check out the website in my tagline and see how 'awake' I am.

[For those of you who are interested in participating in an open message board with a sense of humor and a wider variety of opinions, there is a link to one at the top left corner of my web page.]
14 posted on 03/04/2006 6:00:32 PM PST by walford (http://the-big-pic.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: walford
Well, you see the Left is not about to criticize the Islamic Republic for the same reasons that NOW was silent during the Taliban:

Correct. Their stated goal is not their real goal.

Ramsey Clark should be treated as the doddering old fool he is, spurned by fame and, unable to accept the rejection, he keeps stalking it.

15 posted on 03/05/2006 1:37:16 AM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson