Posted on 03/07/2006 12:21:36 PM PST by jcb8199
Unfortunately GOP partisans only saw a (D) and Dem partisans only saw a traitor to the party. Personally I think we would be hard pressed to find a better conservative in the republican party.
still, little mention of Able Danger....
Excellent work although hard on my BP.
mc
And in a related story;
Saddam killed Abu Nidal over al-Qa'eda row
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2002/08/25/wnidal25.xml
Robert Torricelli was accused of the same things but on a much grander scale, he still walks around free. Traficant fought the IRS and won (the traficant ammendment) accused the clintons of treason and Janet Reno of murdering American citizens. Talk about asking for trouble.
It's not like we didn't know who Binnie was... we knew exactly who knocked the buildings down one minute after it happened. There wasn't any doubt.
This is hardly new
Which is why it's so funny... I added the "breaking news" myself, as it is clearly anything but (though the Media doesn't seem to think so).
Since the Bush team was not accorded the standard courtesies and briefings given the new administration because the RATS were trying to steal it for Gore; its National Security appointments were held up by the RATS in the Senate and the new FBI director was not confirmed until a week before 9/11 I would say it is questionable that Bush was given all the info it should have been.
Then also think about the fact that Traficant is in Jail. Add that the information in the Bennett Report and I think Traficant was sent up the river by the Clintoons
Bump to that!
It appears that you added the "breaking news" yourself because you thought it was breaking news. The media is covering the Moussaoui sentencing hearing and all its inclusions.
bump
Refresh my memory, was GWB sworn in on Jan. 20th, 2001?
Michael Anticev is discussed in "1,000 Years for Revenge" see www.peterlance.com
Yes but his administration was not allowed to put his National Security team in place since the RATS were holding up confirmations. Not only that but we don't know how much information was destroyed by the Clintonistas. We do know that ABLE DANGER was supposed to have been fortunately courageous military men stopped that.
You believe just because Bush was sworn in all he had to do was wave his magik wand and all would be revealed?
Pathetic!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.