No. In post #91 you presented a couple of arguments against evolution, one of which I presented evidence to refute (virus insertions) and you have merely presented hopeful guesses that this must be because of identical insertions in multiple species, which has been dealt with here before and I'm convinced thoroughly debunked.
Nevertheless, your original statement was that evolutionists violate all the rules of logic when coming to their conclusions
This is in the context of other posts of yours that, if I remember correctly, insisted on strict logic. Therefore, you have a whole lot of work to do to support that *all* the rules of logic are broken by science when coming to *all* their conclusions. Post #91 doesn't cut it.