To: narby
It's a little more complicated than that. Not just similar DNA. We have identical, inherited virus DNA segments that vary between species in an identical pattern to the morphological conclusions of past species splits.
Sounds like another self fulfilling prophecy at work, since you can just make that claim for all life that shares common characteristics. You are assuming the singularity so it is not hard to prove it.
Ok. I revise it to say: Evolutionists say that because we have super duper expialidocious common characteristics with the DNA of chimps, we have the same common ancestor.
You need to support your claim that science violates *all* the rules of logic when coming to *all* their conclusions.
OK. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
To: microgood
Ok. I revise it to say: Evolutionists say that because we have super duper expialidocious common characteristics with the DNA of chimps, we have the same common ancestor.
This is not an accurate statement. A more accurate statement would be that in addition to extensive fossil evidence, markers in analagously identical positions of non-coding regions of the DNA of both humans and chimpanzees show identical viral insertions, providing strong evidence for descent from common ancestry of the two species. This is more than just common characteristics in the DNA, this is common characteristics in DNA segments where a difference would have no effect on physical characteristics of the organism.
186 posted on
03/07/2006 5:09:16 PM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson