1 posted on
03/08/2006 1:56:42 PM PST by
indcons
2 posted on
03/08/2006 1:57:31 PM PST by
indcons
(The MSM - Mainstream Slime Merchants)
To: indcons
ABRAMOFF: 'I WAS A KILLER'
No, but we can stick you in a jail cell with one.
3 posted on
03/08/2006 1:58:27 PM PST by
Berlin_Freeper
(ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
To: indcons
4 posted on
03/08/2006 1:59:04 PM PST by
krb
(ad hominem arguments are for stupid people)
To: indcons
Jack was syphoning off some of McCain's Indian money?
5 posted on
03/08/2006 2:00:38 PM PST by
johnny7
(“Iuventus stultorum magister”)
To: indcons
Abramoff is well aware of his peril: "In a different era I'd be killed on the street or have poison poured into my coffee," he tells Margolick.
We called that the Clinton Era.
8 posted on
03/08/2006 2:03:01 PM PST by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: indcons
tells Margolick that sending him to prison is "stupid," saying, "Let me teach English, history, music. Or let me sweep floors at the reservation. Instead you'll be paying to feed me to sit in a jail."
“Killer” sounds ready to cry like a bitch.
10 posted on
03/08/2006 2:04:27 PM PST by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: indcons
"I was a killer. I killed for my clients, and it eventually killed me," Abramoff tells Margolick He probably shouldn't talk like that while the SunCruz stories are still floating around.
-PJ
To: indcons
Lighten up, Francis!
13 posted on
03/08/2006 2:06:51 PM PST by
evets
(God bless president Bush!)
To: indcons
I still back Abramoff on this.
He did nothing wrong.
He gave Indian money to both sides, as a lobbyist, to gain their favor in future contracts they might apply for. The money is on record.
That is what lobbyists do.
It seems to me the reason Abramoff was targeted was because he was non-partisan.
16 posted on
03/08/2006 2:16:43 PM PST by
UCANSEE2
(and miles to go before I sleep.)
To: indcons
A common assumption among criminal types is that their guilt can somehow be mitigated by pointing out the guilt of others. I don't expect him to not implicate others, of course. But I see him as saying, "I may be bad, but look at them, they're BAAAAAD!"
20 posted on
03/08/2006 2:38:07 PM PST by
Jaysun
(The plain truth is that I am not a fair man, and don't want to hear both sides.)
To: indcons
"You're really no one in this town unless you haven't met me"...
Cool! I guess that makes me a somebody!!!!
22 posted on
03/08/2006 4:10:05 PM PST by
DJ Frisat
(Tired of being called intolerant by the truly intolerant...)
To: indcons
"You're really no one in this town unless you haven't met me,"Doesn't he really mean:
You're no one unless you have met me?
26 posted on
03/08/2006 7:36:43 PM PST by
ladyjane
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
