Skip to comments.
Immortal Styrofoam Meets its Enemy
LiveScience ^
| Mar 7, 2006
| Robert Roy Britt
Posted on 03/08/2006 8:30:23 PM PST by djf
Immortal Styrofoam Meets its Enemy By Robert Roy Britt LiveScience Managing Editor posted: 07 March 2006 09:27 am ET
There's an old joke that if you were reincarnated, you might want to come back as a Styrofoam cup.
Why? Because they last forever. Ba-dum-bum.
Despite being made 95 percent of air, Styrofoam's manufactured immortality has posed a problem for recycling efforts. More than 3 million tons of the durable material is produced every year in the United States, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Very little of it is recycled.
Help may come from bacteria that have been found to eat Styrofoam and turn it into useable plastic. This is the stuff recycling dreams are made of: Yesterday's cup could become tomorrow's plastic spoon.
Kevin OConnor of University College Dublin and his colleagues heated polystyrene foam, the generic name for Styrofoam, to convert it to styrene oil. The natural form of styrene is in real peanuts, strawberries and a good steak. A synthetic form is used in car parts and electronic components.
Anyway, the scientists fed this styrene oil to the soil bacteria Pseudomonas putida, which converted it into biodegradable plastic known as PHA (polyhydroxyalkanoates).
PHA can be used to make plastic forks and packaging film. It is resistant to heat, grease and oil. It also lasts a long time. But unlike Styrofoam, PHA biodegrades in soil and water.
The process will be detailed in the April 1 issue of the American Chemical Society journal Environmental Science & Technology.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: recycling; styrofoam; styrofoamrecycling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
1
posted on
03/08/2006 8:30:24 PM PST
by
djf
To: djf
I recall the gov telling the styro industry they couldn't use freon as a foaming agent anymore.
The EPA's alternative?
Butane!
2
posted on
03/08/2006 8:33:27 PM PST
by
steve8714
(Burn Peugeot, burn.)
To: djf
I always thought that styrofoam was being recycled in the form of Dominoes pizza crust and MREs.
3
posted on
03/08/2006 8:35:18 PM PST
by
SamAdams76
(Venus is dazzling, but not very high, in the western sky)
To: steve8714
This is a pretty important find, I think something like 60 percent of landfill volume is styro.
The stuff's like a bad old girlfriend. Won't go away.
4
posted on
03/08/2006 8:35:28 PM PST
by
djf
(I'm not Islamophobic. But I am bombophobic! If that's the same, freakin deal with it!)
To: djf
"Yummm! I LOVE fast food containers!"
To: steve8714
I find burning the stuff works great. Since I am working night and day to hurry along global warming by burning my trash so that Seattle becomes tropical again, or at least like CA.
6
posted on
03/08/2006 8:40:58 PM PST
by
stubernx98
(cranky, but reasonable)
To: stubernx98
I thought we dissolved it in gasoline and called it napalm.
7
posted on
03/08/2006 8:43:03 PM PST
by
csmusaret
(Urban Sprawl is an oxymoron)
To: djf
To prevent duplication, please do not alter the heading. Thanks.
To: djf
Thermal Depolymerization (aka Thermal Conversion Process). Turns "anything" into oil (see the recent update in Discover magazine). Put plastic in. Get oil back out.
To: Question_Assumptions
Heard about it. Not sure what the cost/benefit ratio is.
We got a heck of alot of cottonwoods here in the northwest, and they grow like wildfire.
10
posted on
03/08/2006 8:51:37 PM PST
by
djf
(I'm not Islamophobic. But I am bombophobic! If that's the same, freakin deal with it!)
To: djf
This is a pretty important find, I think something like 60 percent of landfill volume is styro. Another "urban myth" vampire is created.
So many ignorant people (controlling types) want so much to believe this, that they will repeat it (unchallenged) until it is assumed to be true.
11
posted on
03/08/2006 8:53:09 PM PST
by
Publius6961
(Multiculturalism is the white flag of a dying country)
To: djf
If you don't mind downloading a huge PDF, you can find a copy of the first Discover magazine article
here, which describes the process and potential benefits. The costs turned out to be higher than that article projected (in part because the US didn't ban feeding turkey waste back to turkeys, which means they have to pay for the waste rather than being paid to dispose of it) but there is an update in the current issue of Discover that explains where things stand, how they are finally getting the subsidy issue worked out, and where things are headed.
To: Publius6961
Well, then, Snopes me out. While it may not entirely be styro, I know I've heard over 50% is packing materials.
13
posted on
03/08/2006 8:58:48 PM PST
by
djf
(I'm not Islamophobic. But I am bombophobic! If that's the same, freakin deal with it!)
To: djf
The process will be detailed in the April 1 issue of the American Chemical Society journal Environmental Science & Technology. I'm skeptical...
14
posted on
03/08/2006 8:59:26 PM PST
by
twhitak
To: twhitak
I've always said it's only a matter of time before some critter crawls out of a landfill and decides it really thinks polyester is tasty stuff.
Then, the next time you drive by a K-Mart, all you see is big, ugly, bare bottoms.
15
posted on
03/08/2006 9:03:13 PM PST
by
djf
(I'm not Islamophobic. But I am bombophobic! If that's the same, freakin deal with it!)
To: djf
I thought land fills were 60% disposable diapers.
Must change daily.
16
posted on
03/08/2006 9:10:47 PM PST
by
truemiester
(If the U.S. should fail, a veil of darkness will come over the Earth for a thousand years)
To: djf
"By weight, plastics make up about 11 percent of Americas municipal solid waste. In comparison, paper makes up about 36 percent.
Of course, plastics are generally very lightweight. When plastics are buried in a landfill, they occupy about 25 percent of the space." (EIA Kid's website)
17
posted on
03/08/2006 9:23:06 PM PST
by
endthematrix
(None dare call it ISLAMOFACISM!)
To: djf
Hmmmm....So what would be produced if you fed democrats to these bacteria?
18
posted on
03/08/2006 9:30:58 PM PST
by
Buck W.
(John Kerry: The Emir of Absurdistan.)
To: Buck W.
Whatever it was, I'm sure the EPA would have to classify it as "waste products"
19
posted on
03/08/2006 9:32:56 PM PST
by
djf
(I'm not Islamophobic. But I am bombophobic! If that's the same, freakin deal with it!)
To: djf
I think something like 60 percent of landfill volume is styro. The rest is left over Earth Day posters.
20
posted on
03/08/2006 9:55:42 PM PST
by
Richard Kimball
(I like to make everyone's day a little more surreal)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson