[veronica]

For god's sake, is it possible for there ever to be a post about the Holocaust without someone exploiting the situation to bash Jews for something or other?

No. It's the nature of the antisemitic beast.

[Stirner]

"It's the nature of the antisemitic beast."

What I took the poster to be underlining is the irony that a group that has at least as much reason as any group in history to protect itself from unprovoked attack should have so many members who oppose people having access to one of the means of protecting themselves. How does noting that incongruity amount to anti-semitism?

[BagelFace]

For god's sake, is it possible for there ever to be a post about the Holocaust without someone exploiting the situation to bash Jews for something or other?

Extremely silly. Silly silly silly. For example, why do 75% of Jews vote for Gore/Kerry when it hurts Isarael? Not a bashing or anti-semitic question, but a very good question. One that has been asked in such venues as National Review, for example. Are they being anti-semitic or bashing Jews? Doesn't saying that about everything like saying "it's all Bush's fault" to everything. Useless, counter-productive, and silly silly silly post.