Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mike Darancette
"But it is believed that an impact 17 mya caused the Yellowstone hot spot in the first place."

No kidding? I've never heard this before.

Now, I have heard that a comet fragment may have caused the Thera eruption in 1628BC.

10 posted on 03/09/2006 12:22:22 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: blam

Actually the theory is you get a hotspot and flood basalt on the OPPOSITE side of the planet from the asteroid impact, through focusing of seismic energy.

It's been out there for a while, and the people behind it aren't kooks, but it's not widely accepted. There are some interesting "line ups" of large impacts with hotspots on the other side of the world.

One fly in the ointment is that it's now pretty clear that hotspots aren't perfectly stationary in the mantle with the plates moving over them; the hotspots themselves move some.


12 posted on 03/09/2006 12:43:13 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Actually the idea of impacts causing a hotspot on the opposite side of the earth has been around a long time...

This is a PDF paper from Sandia National Labs about it in 1994..

http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/servlets/purl/10197028-5vKwmj/webviewable/10197028.pdf


13 posted on 03/09/2006 12:49:02 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson