Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush signs renewal of Patriot Act
AP ^ | 3/9/6 | DEB RIECHMANN

Posted on 03/09/2006 12:55:20 PM PST by SmithL

WASHINGTON - After a long battle with Congress that went down to the wire, President Bush signed a renewal of the USA Patriot Act on Thursday, a day before 16 major provisions of the old law expire.

Bush said the Patriot Act is vital to win the war on terror and protect Americans. He recalled the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and said the country is still at war.

"We saw the terrorists' destructive vision for us when they killed nearly 3,000 men, women and children," Bush said. "In the face of this ruthless threat, our nation has made a clear choice - we will confront this mortal danger, we will stay on the offensive and we're not going to wait to be attacked again."

Bush's signature came less than 48 hours after the House passed the legislation, ending several months of debate on Capitol Hill over how to balance Americans' right to privacy with a need to foil potential terrorist threats. Political battles over the legislation forced Congress to twice extend the expiration date of the Patriot Act.

"The Patriot Act has accomplished exactly what it was designed to do," Bush said during a signing ceremony in the White House East Room. "It has helped us detect terrorist cells, disrupt terrorist plots and save American lives."

Republicans want to take the law into the upcoming midterm elections to show they are acting to protect national security.

The legislation renews the expiring provisions of the original Patriot Act, including one that lets federal officials obtain "tangible items," such as business records, from libraries and bookstores, in connection with foreign intelligence and international terrorism investigations.

Other provisions clarify that foreign intelligence or counterintelligence officers should share information obtained as part of a criminal investigation with agencies.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 109th; billsigning; bush43; gwot; homelandsecurity; patriotact; term2; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-118 next last

1 posted on 03/09/2006 12:55:23 PM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

President Bush sure seems weakened, huh?


2 posted on 03/09/2006 12:56:11 PM PST by SmithL (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Yep, those democrats really killed this bill and weakened Bush's powers by golly! Harry Reid = Mr. Incredibly Stupid!


3 posted on 03/09/2006 12:57:18 PM PST by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

President Bush? Wasn't he going to be impeached, or something?


4 posted on 03/09/2006 12:57:53 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Rush said the President shook everyones hand after the signing 'cept Peter King. Guess he feels kinda lonely for a King?


5 posted on 03/09/2006 12:59:49 PM PST by b4its2late (Terrorists will either succeed in changing our way of life, or we will change theirs. - Rummy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

"President Bush? Wasn't he going to be impeached, or something?"

If he hangs his stetson on this stupid port deal, then things may get interesting this mid-term election. As Reagan said (paraphrased), no need to TRY and go for the whole loaf later, when you KNOW you can get half now. Short for the port deal after the election. The trial balloon whipped around the room and fell in the fish tank.


6 posted on 03/09/2006 1:02:28 PM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"After a long battle with Congress that went down to the wire..."

Rolls eyes.

Wasn't the Senate vote something like 89 to 10?!

7 posted on 03/09/2006 1:03:15 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Tulsa Ramjet
"If he hangs his stetson on this stupid port deal, then things may get interesting this mid-term election"

Don't kid yourself. The Port Deal Hysterics just handed the Democrats the US Senate and probably the US House depending how the Texas case turns out. The crucial edge the Republicans had was National Security. The ignorant bigots with their Port Deal Hysteria just took the Democrats Senate PR stunt and spewed it nonstop until the myth of "Democrats are tough on National Security" is now cared in stonge.

Well Done. Way to pretty much guarantee the Democrats will take the US Senate back this year. The ONE issue the Republicans had the edge on was National Security. Way to take a Democrat Senate Election year ploy and feverishly propagandize it. Way to mindlessly regurgitate the lies, disinformation and guilt by association being pumped out by Chucky Schumer and the Democrats PR Machine. Spare us the pseudo Conservatism. Actions speak louder then words. Let's not kid ourselves here. The Port Deal Hysteria had NOTHING to do with National Security, the facts or better ideas. It had to do with the Whine All The Time Choir being mad at Bush. Since they were mad, they keep searching for new things to have a hissy fit about. The latest thing was the Port Deal.

The opposition to the Port Deal had NOTHING to do with facts, reason or data. It had to do with an emotionally hysteric temper tantrum. The Whiners were simply desperate to "Get even with Bush" for spending or immigration or whatever; so they did NOT even bother to learn a single fact.

Only problem is this hissy fit is going to pretty much destroied the Republican Majority. The ONE thing the Republicans had going for them was the National Security Issue. The Whiners have all thrown that away by rabidly regurgitating the Democrats PR Talking points on the Ports. Well done. Way to actively work to elect Democrats. Congratulation. Rush Limbaugh was the Majority Maker, the Port Deal Hysterics will be remembered as the Minority Creators.

9 posted on 03/09/2006 1:09:47 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Professional Journalism- the Buggy Whip makers of the 21st century)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This is how liberty ends, with thunderous applause.


10 posted on 03/09/2006 1:11:34 PM PST by CrawDaddyCA (There is no such thing as a fair fight. Thou shall win at all costs!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: princess leah
Yep, those democrats really killed this bill and weakened Bush's powers by golly! Harry Reid = Mr. Incredibly Stupid!

They were busy trying to make political hay with the Dubai port deal.

The Dubai turned the tables on them and withdrew the deal, leaving Schumer with no senate vote to brag about. Dingy Harry and Dick Durbin held a news conference demanding the vote, and the deal was already off but they still wanted a "show" vote.

11 posted on 03/09/2006 1:13:27 PM PST by capt. norm (Error: Keyboard not attached. Press F1 to continue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Nice! Thanks for the pick me up. It's been a very long day. :)

I'm surprised more people are not on this thread ..well, maybe I'm not. It's more fun for some to be over on the ports mania threads.

They are missing a good story.

12 posted on 03/09/2006 1:14:33 PM PST by Earthdweller ("West to Islam" Cake. Butter your liberals, slowly cook France, stir in Europe then watch it rise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
ANOTHER BUSH WIN

13 posted on 03/09/2006 1:15:12 PM PST by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

"Way to actively work to elect Democrats. Congratulation. Rush Limbaugh was the Majority Maker,"

Rush? What does he have to do with it? Any thread with the word "Port" involved you get about a thousand responses. This means you have conservatives having heated, sincere, discussions about "something." And because this fact exists, someone did a poor job of explaining why we should give up port operations in six locations of senators who knew nothing about it. Now, who do you think that someone is? Rove? He said he didn't know. Bush? He said he didn't know. Well then, who is left? Is it ours? (noncompliant conservatives) What we can't discuss issues dear to us? We are un-enlightened because we disagree? Spare us.


14 posted on 03/09/2006 1:15:45 PM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

Because this is about its 5th time through


15 posted on 03/09/2006 1:15:54 PM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Glad to see you over here Johnnie.

You are a real trooper. Those wackos on the ports threads are congratulating themselves for supporting Dems while Bush is just quietly working away in the background. :)

16 posted on 03/09/2006 1:17:24 PM PST by Earthdweller ("West to Islam" Cake. Butter your liberals, slowly cook France, stir in Europe then watch it rise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny
President Bush? Wasn't he going to be impeached, or something?

Yeah, he moved back to Texas didn't he? I mean Novak said he was a lame duck.

17 posted on 03/09/2006 1:17:57 PM PST by ReaganRevolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

After the DPW firm pulls out of the port deal, conservatives who spent the last few weeks pretending to care about port security will go back to being completely ignorant and carefree on the topic.


18 posted on 03/09/2006 1:18:35 PM PST by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ReaganRevolution

Novak has been quacking since the 80's.


19 posted on 03/09/2006 1:19:09 PM PST by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
A sad day for the Constitution, once again. And for people with sinus problems.

But the "patriot" act will only be used for terrorism. And drugs. And stuff.
20 posted on 03/09/2006 1:19:40 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late
I watch this on tv. President Bush DID shake Peter King's hand.

Peter King is in the same league as the black Congresswomen who insult the President on a daily basis but make sure to get the aisle seat during the SOTU address. They all bash the President but would stab their mothers in the back to be seen on tv shaking his hand.

King was front row center at the signing. The President thanked him for his help with this bill.

I couldn't be a politician. I would have told King to %^&*% himself.
21 posted on 03/09/2006 1:20:45 PM PST by Republican Red ("How good is it? Al-Jazeera gave it 4 1/2 pipe bombs")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
Novak has been quacking since the 80's.

Another reason I don't watch Fox News anymore.

22 posted on 03/09/2006 1:23:59 PM PST by ReaganRevolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
A sad day for the Constitution, once again

Please cite for me three examples of where the Patriot Act has been used to infringe on the Constitutional Rights of Americans.

23 posted on 03/09/2006 1:24:00 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Professional Journalism- the Buggy Whip makers of the 21st century)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red

Oh, ok. I didn't think Bush would do that, he just isn't that way.


24 posted on 03/09/2006 1:24:42 PM PST by b4its2late (Terrorists will either succeed in changing our way of life, or we will change theirs. - Rummy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Don't kid yourself. The Port Deal Hysterics just handed the Democrats the US Senate and probably the US House depending how the Texas case turns out.



I think you are wrong. We'll know in about 8 months. PR wise the administration screwed the pooch badly on this deal. I agree it's not what the anti DPW crowd says it is but they got the news out and made their case until that is what a large number of the public believed.

Until Nov. we have to move forward.


25 posted on 03/09/2006 1:26:08 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CrawDaddyCA
Is mysterio your puppet? lol
26 posted on 03/09/2006 1:27:57 PM PST by verity (The MSM is comprised of useless eaters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Go bot somewhere else. I've been over this with tons of you bots already in multiple threads. Every one of you would be screaming to high heaven if this happened under dems. Especially you.

Foul legs good, two legs better!
27 posted on 03/09/2006 1:30:05 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Gee, Harry - I thought that the Patriot Bill was dead - you said it was...........

Arrogant fool.


28 posted on 03/09/2006 1:32:12 PM PST by roaddog727 (P=3/8 A. or, P=plenty...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Since it's a felony to disclose how FISA warrants are being used, we would never know if the changes the USA PATRIOT Act made to FISA have resulted in abuses. Or not.


29 posted on 03/09/2006 1:32:53 PM PST by ivyleaguebrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm

"This is an unxeptected move by the Trade Federation..." SW episode I--just for fun...I couldn't resist

This certainly lessens the sting, but they've already made a big noise, and that can go a long way just like misleading headlines. It may be false, and much ado about nothing, but as it goes, say something often and loud enough and it becomes true


30 posted on 03/09/2006 1:34:50 PM PST by Dominion Thing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
Way to totally destroy any intellectual credibility you may have ever had here. HAAAA. You knee jerks are so easy to make explode. Simply ask a question and your comfortable bigoted little bubble world explodes.

Please cite for me three examples of where the Patriot Act has been used to infringe on the Constitutional Rights of Americans

Answer the question this time. Screaming hate and bile at anyone who questions your dogma does NOT convince anyone that your views have the slightest merit. It merely makes you look even more foolish.

31 posted on 03/09/2006 1:39:52 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Professional Journalism- the Buggy Whip makers of the 21st century)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
Go bot somewhere else.

Troll, heal thyself. (I know the phrase is "physician", but like Howard Dean, I shudder at the thought of you being a physician for anyone.)

Of course, you don't have to leave. Neither does the person whom you told to "bot" elsewhere. Welcome to America.

32 posted on 03/09/2006 1:42:14 PM PST by Christian4Bush (I'd much rather hunt with Dick Cheney than ride with Ted Kennedy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Imagine what he could do if he wasn't a Lame Duck?? Keep misunderestimating and he will keep chalking up the W's!!

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters


33 posted on 03/09/2006 1:42:57 PM PST by bray (Proud Bushbot for 6 years going on 8!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Here Johnnie....I found a dead Moose for all the losers to Kiss. Isn't it cute?



34 posted on 03/09/2006 1:43:10 PM PST by Earthdweller ("West to Islam" Cake. Butter your liberals, slowly cook France, stir in Europe then watch it rise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Suck a lemon Bob Barr you big dope.


35 posted on 03/09/2006 1:43:29 PM PST by jmaroneps37 (John Spencer is the warrior we have been waiting for.We can trust him with our future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ivyleaguebrat

Sorry. That is more Urban Mythology dressed up as "Fact" by the Patriot Act hysterics. Completely untrue.


36 posted on 03/09/2006 1:44:29 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Professional Journalism- the Buggy Whip makers of the 21st century)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Good. I think this shows there is a "healthy" skepticism over the government's intrusion into civil liberties, we had a debate, concerns were resolved. Shows the strength of our system although the Michael Moore-fringe will say we're creating a police state at the same time they didn't balk at Reno's armed assaults at Waco, Ruby Ridge or to return Elian Gonzales to Castro's Cuba.

When does it expire next?

37 posted on 03/09/2006 1:44:51 PM PST by newzjunkey (All I need is a safe home and peace of mind. Why am I still in CA?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

King was out there defending Bush after Katrina. Big time.


38 posted on 03/09/2006 1:45:52 PM PST by rightinthemiddle (The Liberals/Media Hate Us Just as Much as They Hate Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
The Dems aren't going to win the Senate OR the House, Johnnie.......no matter how stupid the Republicans just acted.

Americans have short memories. Most of them weren't paying a bit of attention, and now that DPW has behaved like adults in response to the hysteria of the Congress, it will fade away.

There is NO question as to which party is stronger on national security, and in the individual races, that fact will be clear.

This is just a blip. It will be gone by November.

39 posted on 03/09/2006 1:46:07 PM PST by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
It's a BS question. The infringement is in the document itself. The "patriot" act allows the government to get rubber stamp warrants without probable cause. The fourth amendment requires probable cause.

Keep drinking that kool-aid! Party before principle!
40 posted on 03/09/2006 1:46:51 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

Is that your sister?


41 posted on 03/09/2006 1:46:54 PM PST by rightinthemiddle (The Liberals/Media Hate Us Just as Much as They Hate Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie; mysterio
Please cite for me three examples of where the Patriot Act has been used to infringe on the Constitutional Rights of Americans.

He can't because it hasn't, and won't ever do that.

(pssst.....mysterio..........just don't break the law, or become a terrorist, and you'll be fine).

42 posted on 03/09/2006 1:48:12 PM PST by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

Johnnie doesn't drink Kool-Aid.


43 posted on 03/09/2006 1:48:22 PM PST by rightinthemiddle (The Liberals/Media Hate Us Just as Much as They Hate Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle
Hahaha.. No it's the winner take all prize for the Dems. They "killed" a big bad moose and now they gotta kiss it. It's a tradition.
44 posted on 03/09/2006 1:52:20 PM PST by Earthdweller ("West to Islam" Cake. Butter your liberals, slowly cook France, stir in Europe then watch it rise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

If the DUMMIES were pushing this act upon us you people would be pounding the desks and mad as hell.


45 posted on 03/09/2006 1:55:19 PM PST by Realism (Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle

"King was out there defending Bush after Katrina. Big time."

The congressman from NYC?


46 posted on 03/09/2006 1:55:30 PM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
Please cite for me three examples of where the Patriot Act has been used to infringe on the Constitutional Rights of Americans

Answer the question this time.

47 posted on 03/09/2006 1:56:07 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Professional Journalism- the Buggy Whip makers of the 21st century)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
abuses

MNBot's response : "I know that these are all categorically false because they are from the ACLU!"
48 posted on 03/09/2006 2:02:02 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
"Don't kid yourself. The Port Deal Hysterics just handed the Democrats the US Senate and probably the US House depending how the Texas case turns out."

Let's see now. Almost 5 years without an attack on the nation, the Democrats on multiple occasions have called for us to cut and run from Iraq, called our soldiers Nazi's (Durbin), claimed the WOT was a "legal" problem to be handled by law enforcement (Kerry), have shown more concern for the civil rights of terrorists then the security of Americans (NSA leaks) and you claim that because of this one issue, which has know been stopped at the request of the UAE, that Americans suddenly believe the Democrats are the better choice to protect us?

How can anyone possibly be as eager to drink the liberal kool aid as you? You seem to think the public has forgotten all the libs have done to hurt the war effort but will NEVER forget the perfectly legal if not politically inept port deal.

49 posted on 03/09/2006 2:04:44 PM PST by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Rush said after he signed the bill into law, he shook everyone's hand except Peter "The United Arab Emirates are our enemy" King's. BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!


50 posted on 03/09/2006 2:06:44 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson