To: AZRepublican
what is intersting is that there are no impact craters in the area. Interesting indeed.
To: K4Harty
The lack of craters is due to the active geology of the place (with water ice taking the place of rock, of course). Any craters get wiped out in a geologically brief period of time.
24 posted on
03/09/2006 2:39:06 PM PST by
orionblamblam
(A furore Normannorum libra nos, Domine)
To: K4Harty
what is intersting is that there are no impact craters in the area. There probably were. Localized geologic activity erased them.
74 posted on
03/09/2006 4:21:09 PM PST by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Crime cannot be tolerated. Criminals thrive on the indulgences of society's understanding.)
To: K4Harty
what is intersting is that there are no impact craters in the area. Interesting indeed.I noticed the same thing. That means that the area free of large cratering has been resurfaced since the heavy-bombardment era. Same as Europa.
87 posted on
03/09/2006 6:36:01 PM PST by
FierceDraka
("Sure as I know anything, I know this: I aim to misbehave." - Capt. Mal Reynolds)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson