Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Seems like the land grabs made possible by the USSC decision last year is hitting more than just private homes. I imagine secularists will rejoice over this injustice.
1 posted on 03/09/2006 3:46:30 PM PST by twntaipan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: twntaipan

The only folks who weren't predicting that churches would be be first hit were most likely liars or fools.


2 posted on 03/09/2006 3:48:47 PM PST by FormerLib (Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twntaipan

I'd like to see many challenges, I am just not hopeful since both O'Conner AND Rehnquist voted against Kelo.

The real swing vote, Kennedy, is still at large.


3 posted on 03/09/2006 3:50:21 PM PST by sittnick (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twntaipan

BTTT


4 posted on 03/09/2006 3:50:31 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twntaipan
I imagine secularists will rejoice over this injustice. Yes, they will. Until the Sierra Club or the ACLU-sers lose their non-profit, tax-exempt properties under that same theory.
5 posted on 03/09/2006 3:52:02 PM PST by PeterFinn (Anita Bryant was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twntaipan

This is what happens when you give Christophobes and other hatemongers the power to seize people's property to improve the tax base, or for whatever other reason (just because they don't like you.)

That is one of the key tenets of Fascism, BTW.


6 posted on 03/09/2006 4:05:43 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twntaipan

Oh oh. Sorry, I can't read through that. Totally unjust and greedy.


10 posted on 03/09/2006 5:21:22 PM PST by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twntaipan

When lawmen break the law, there is no law. -- Billy Jack


11 posted on 03/09/2006 5:23:04 PM PST by Richard Kimball (I like to make everyone's day a little more surreal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twntaipan; WKB

Fire up the Baptist Ping list please.


12 posted on 03/09/2006 5:26:55 PM PST by CajunConservative (Don't Blame Me, I Voted for Jindal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twntaipan
Maybe this was the prime underlying strategy all along...how to close the churches -

P> We need to spread democracy in America - for it is lost. We are indeed a socialist country

13 posted on 03/09/2006 5:34:42 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twntaipan
"“In my view, the Supreme Court made a terrible mistake in Kelo, and I think they know that and they’re going to be looking for a way to extricate [themselves] from that case,” Eastman told Baptist Press. “It seems to me that the best challenge to the principle of that case is a church case, where there is no economic output, so any economic development could then be utilized to take out the church under the Kelo theory."

Roger that! Along with any other "nonprofit" organizations, institutions, or properties... like schools, public hospitals and (gasp) even government buildings.
16 posted on 03/09/2006 6:54:53 PM PST by DocRock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twntaipan
I wonder what's their strategy to bring this up before the supreme court again?
18 posted on 03/09/2006 7:48:19 PM PST by Fishing-guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twntaipan; Bob J; DoughtyOne; doug from upland

Anything practical we can do to help?

Love to do some FReeping while I'm in town.


21 posted on 03/09/2006 8:32:37 PM PST by Brian Allen (How arrogant are we to believe our career political-power-lusting lumpen somehow superior to theirs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twntaipan

This decision by SCOTUS still outrages me. I'm sorry that guy wasn't able to get Souter's home to prove his point.


22 posted on 03/09/2006 9:11:30 PM PST by newzjunkey (All I need is a safe home and peace of mind. Why am I still in CA?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twntaipan
This organization is first class group that can take it all the way to the supreme court. SBC has money to fund the fight.

http://www.claremont.org/projects/jurisprudence/lbchurch.html
23 posted on 03/09/2006 9:50:51 PM PST by ThomasThomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twntaipan
the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 last summer in Kelo v. New London, Connecticut that a city’s use of eminent domain to transfer property from one private party to another may qualify as a “public use” protected by the Constitution.
...“That’s preposterous, so I think getting a church case up there in very short order may get them to rethink Kelo,” Eastman said.

Why would they rethink it? All five of the majority are still on the SC. Unless Roberts and Alito are more persuasive than Rehnquist and O'Connor were, why would any one of the five change his mind?

... they’re going to be looking for a way to extricate [themselves] from that case,” Eastman told Baptist Press. “It seems to me that the best challenge to the principle of that case is a church case, where there is no economic output, so any economic development could then be utilized to take out the church under the Kelo theory.

I'm pessimistic about the chances that any of the majority has changed his mind about the Kelo decision and wants to extricate himself from the mess. Surely someone must have suggested the potential consequences of Kelo to churches/nonprofits when the SC considered the case. Still, a church case seems to be the best way to challenge Kelo, and by the time the case gets to the SC, hopefully at least one of the five will have retired.

24 posted on 03/10/2006 2:46:18 AM PST by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian Allen; twntaipan

I am struck by the fact that eight churches are being affected by this terrible decision as we speak. That almost seems like a concerted effort directed against Churches.

Because of personal matters I can't commit to a FReeping at this moment, but I will keep this in mind Brian. If I can in a week or so I'll come back and address that idea again.


26 posted on 03/10/2006 6:00:39 AM PST by DoughtyOne (If you don't want to be lumped in with those who commit violence in your name, take steps to end it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twntaipan
City leaders in Long Beach, Calif., have classified the Filipino Baptist Fellowship’s building as a blighted area and are forcing the congregation out in order to make way for condominiums.

They are going to hell.

27 posted on 03/11/2006 11:16:15 AM PST by Rytwyng ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche......"Oh, yeah? Wait 3 days!!!" -- God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: twntaipan; WKB

huh!

I posted this but didn't see your posting at the time.
If you see any thing further on this in the future please ping either myself or wkb because we have a Baptist ping list. There were some folks who want to keep up with this story.


28 posted on 03/11/2006 11:19:18 AM PST by tutstar (Baptist Ping List Freepmail me if you want on or off this ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson