hmmm...what do you suppose it means when the article says they interviewed "non-voters". This study is worthless. It only interviewed about 500 people and many of them are "non-voters" and as far as we can tell they are probably not even citizens in the first place.
"This study is worthless. It only interviewed about 500 people and many of them are "non-voters" and as far as we can tell they are probably not even citizens in the first place."
The only meaningful statistic is the opinion of registered voters.
Do you still think the poll is "useless" though?