Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Interesting to consider. Chapline and his collaborators have been talking about this for a couple of years (and have met with some skepticism, as one might expect):

"Dark Energy Stars" (December, 2004)

"Quantum Phase Transitions and the Breakdown of Classical General Relativity" (2003)

Luboš Motl has an amusing critical take on Chapline's work (in a blog posting from March 14, 2005):

Chapline: black holes don't exist

1 posted on 03/09/2006 8:34:48 PM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: snarks_when_bored

So we will have wormhole warp drives in a few years?


50 posted on 03/10/2006 7:42:47 AM PST by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snarks_when_bored
"It's like we are living inside a giant dark energy star," Chapline says. There is, of course, no explanation yet for how a universe-sized star could come into being.

Which could also explain why there seems to be a possiblity for multiple universes. Multiple giant (universe sized) dark energy stars, residing in yet another universe.

Well that's one way I imagine it could be. I'm not quantum physicist, but I did stay at a Holiday......

54 posted on 03/10/2006 7:51:16 AM PST by American_Centurion (Insert /sarcasm where appropriate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snarks_when_bored
There is, of course, no explanation yet for how a universe-sized star could come into being.

How about the concept that it has always been? Why must every observed thing have a beginning and an end?

56 posted on 03/10/2006 8:02:56 AM PST by TChris ("Wake up, America. This is serious." - Ben Stein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snarks_when_bored
"It's like we are living inside a giant dark energy star," Chapline says. There is, of course, no explanation yet for how a universe-sized star could come into being.

Similar to some of the previous "our universe is a black hole" speculation. The nice part of this angle, though, is that it should be (ever-so-slightly) easier to envision a means of detection of what's outside, given that quarks could theoretically transition the quantum shell.

(Easier, assuming huge advances in means, methods, and resources, that is...)
63 posted on 03/10/2006 9:34:09 AM PST by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snarks_when_bored

Chinese Arithmatic *ping*


71 posted on 03/10/2006 2:08:41 PM PST by Bean Counter ("Stout Hearts!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snarks_when_bored; Allegra; peacebaby; Millee
Re: Chapline: black holes don't exist

Hey man! There will always be black hos...

What about us black and white hos?

I for one, like fuzzy yellow and pink hos...

With my luck, they'll outlaw us park bench hos!

Never, my dear! Never! Want to see my bippy?

We fembot hos will always be around... And, NO! I don't want to see your bippy at any price!

Not even for... a case of zee finest German oil?

No! Well... Maybe for two cases...

Well... I was a total ho for Michael Douglas... And what did it get me?

75 posted on 03/10/2006 2:39:36 PM PST by Bender2 (Redid my FR Homepage just for ya'll... Now, Vote Republican and vote often)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snarks_when_bored

Interesting. The interior of a dark energy star seen from inside might look like there had been a Big Bang 14.5 billion years ago.


86 posted on 03/10/2006 3:55:11 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snarks_when_bored

Dark matter is what my wife buys but I never see around the house...


91 posted on 03/10/2006 5:34:21 PM PST by Doohickey (If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice...I will choose freewill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alamo-Girl; betty boop

Hmmm.. black holes......crystals?...


94 posted on 03/10/2006 8:07:21 PM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snarks_when_bored
Interesting!

While black holes supposedly swallow anything that gets past the event horizon, quantum critical shells are a two-way street, Chapline says. Matter crossing the shell decays, and the anti-gravity should spit some of the remnants back out again. Also, quark particles crossing the shell should decay by releasing positrons and gamma rays, which would pop out of the surface.

Now, consider that the "steady state" universe theories require only a small amount of matter (a few atoms per cubic meter) "re-appearing" in interstellar space to account for the expansion factors: It's interesting to question whether these atoms could come from such stars. Or from Hawking's black-hole quantum centers.

To me, it makes no logical sense to follow a "pure math" black hole where everything becomes a point source. That's merely a mathematical convenience, not realty.

100 posted on 03/14/2006 4:26:04 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson