Posted on 03/10/2006 7:19:13 AM PST by RabidBartender
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) - Recently retired Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan believes that there will be a major independent candidate for president from the nation's political center, according to a published report.
In an interview with The New York Times about his post-Fed activities, Greenspan said he makes that prediction in a memoir, for which he recently got an estimated $8.5 million advance from Penguin Press, a unit of British publishing concern Pearson (Research). Recently retired Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan. Recently retired Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan.
Greenspan told the Times he plans to argue that the current "ideological divide" separating conservative Republicans and liberal Democrats leaves "a vast untended center from which a well-financed independent presidential candidate is likely to emerge in 2008 or, if not then, in 2012."
(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...
Who knew?
Also, if McCain fails to garner the GOP nomination, would he recruit some 'moderate' Dem to be his VP and run as a Reform candidate? McCain/Bayh? McCain/Richardson? McCain/Clinton? (shudder)
LOL, And this from the guy who said he can not predict asset bubbles until after he creates them with massive currency debasement.
ross perot's candidacy was doomed from the git but it put klinton in office.
We don't need a replay with a different cast, least of all one which greenspew has in mind.
Well, what he actually means is that the Dems are so far to the left, and the Republicans are taking that for granted and an independent that is left/moderate will likely come along and steal much of the Democratic non moonbat members.... and if successful will basically spell the end of the Democratic party as it now exists.
There is not as much room on the right, though the stands on immigration, "free trade" and other things are opening up a possibility there too... but its not as big of a one yet.
I saw her (Condi) on C-Span last night testifying before a Senatorial Appropriation Committee along with Gen. John Abazaid.
She's a great gal, and it would seem the military loves and respects her. She'd be a good POTUS.
Greenspan sounds almost gleeful that the "untended" center's needs will be met by this so-called independent candidate.
Methinks Greenspan is not a fan of the religious right, especially if he was a devotee of the atheism of Ayn Rand.
He's a Randian? Interesting. I think our two political parties are left and lefter, and we are likely to see the emergence of a new conservative party. But I could be wrong.
Oh, that's great, warn the Republicrats so they can make sure to kill any possibility of success. You don't think they learned their lesson with Ross Perot? Effective competition cannot be allowed.
Those are some pretty brave words to be posting on Free Republic!
The potential party is already here; the Constitution Party.
New Member.
You got that right. The Republicans are liberal enough, thank you.
I think he got this second-hand, from Andrea who heard it from Hillary. This is the only way she could win, split the "moderate" and "Reagan Democrat" vote with a "ringer". It can't be an identifiable leftist running as a moderate, so who this would be (assuming that McCain doesn't bolt from the GOP) is a mystery.
Especially since the GOP has (with the help of entrenched bureaucrats at the depts. of State, Treasury, INS, Education, Energy, Interior, etc.) already put two wheels in the ditch on the left shoulder of the road.
As soon as Condi stops dividing Israel, kowtowing to fascist states, and supporting abortion I'll be glad to vote for her.
At least she isn't a gun grabber. I guess I could hold my nose like I did in the last two elections, knowing I was voting for the son of a right wing socialist, who in turn has proven to be a chip off the old block.
That's not centrist. That's conservatism.
IOW, Greenspan will support any candidate that is against conservative values.
Plus, dash or two of libertarian. I did leave one issue off - not sure how I forgot - illegal immigration. I am all for legal immigration, but illegals running an off the books economy and consuming entitlement dollars make we want to kick someone's behind.
The only thing preventing a McCain/HRC ticket (which would win easily) is that Hillary will only come if she's on top (so to speak), and that would greatly reduce the chances of success.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.