Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Travis McGee
What took us so long to adopt this?

Institutional preference for the M203, usable as an attachment to the rifle rather than use as a stand-alone weapon.

Previousle, it was thought that if a target deserved multiple rounds of 40mm, the squad leader should just have both his bloop gunners fire on it. Serious work in cities recently shows that there's a need for a little more than that.

I hope they don't eliminate the M203s, though, but add the new *sixgun* to the mix. A Marine fire team with two riflemen, [with or w/o M203s] a Squad Automatic Weapon, and a Sixgun would seem to be a very neat way to go.

Alternately, when serious punch is needed, a back-up fire team with a pair of sixguns, two SAWs, and all additional M16 or M4 rifles fitted with M203s....would seem to be a good start.

130 posted on 03/13/2006 12:29:35 PM PST by archy (The darkness will come. It will find you,and it will scare you like you've never been scared before.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]


To: archy



I wish they would replace the 203 with the H&K version


131 posted on 03/13/2006 1:02:01 PM PST by vrwc0915
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson