To: King Prout
I agree that there is absolutely no reason for anyone to take anything in the article at face value.
Note that I was able to say this without being an uncivilized ass.
If you agree that "there is absolutely no reason for anyone to take anything in the article at face value," then why do you take the comments TOWARD said article at face value? Your last sentence is kind of ironic BTW.
74 posted on
03/11/2006 4:44:50 PM PST by
gogoman
To: gogoman; King Prout
King, go look at gogo's posts again, it looked like gogo was with those others, but I don't think gogo was........
76 posted on
03/11/2006 4:46:16 PM PST by
freema
(Proud Marine FRiend, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
To: gogoman
If you agree that "there is absolutely no reason for anyone to take anything in the article at face value," then why do you take the comments TOWARD said article at face value?rather simple, really: the article presented questionable data in a straightforward manner, whereas the various quips and barbs presented no data save clues as to the questionable character of those who posted them.
Your last sentence is kind of ironic BTW.
actually, it wasn't. but that you would say that it was, is.
80 posted on
03/11/2006 4:55:51 PM PST by
King Prout
(many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson