Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran Builds A Secret Underground Complex As Nuclear Tensions Rise
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 3-12-2006 | Philip Sherwell

Posted on 03/11/2006 5:14:32 PM PST by blam

Iran builds a secret underground complex as nuclear tensions rise

By Philip Sherwell in Washington
(Filed: 12/03/2006)

Iran's leaders have built a secret underground emergency command centre in Teheran as they prepare for a confrontation with the West over their illicit nuclear programme, the Sunday Telegraph has been told.

The complex of rooms and offices beneath the Abbas Abad district in the north of the capital is designed to serve as a bolthole and headquarters for the country's rulers as military tensions mount.

Iran uses small attack boats to simulate assaults on US warships

The recently completed command centre is connected by tunnels to other government compounds near the Mossala prayer ground, one of the city's most important religious sites.

Offices of the state security forces, the energy department and the Organisation of Islamic Culture and Communications are all located in the same area.

The construction of the complex is part of the regime's plan to move more of its operations beneath ground. The Revolutionary Guard has overseen the development of subterranean chambers and tunnels - some more than half a mile long and an estimated 35ft high and wide - at sites across the country for research and development work on nuclear and rocket programmes.

The opposition National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) learnt about the complex from its contacts within the regime. The same network revealed in 2002 that Iran had been operating a secret nuclear programme for 18 years.

The underground strategy is partly designed to hide activities from satellite view and international inspections but also reflects a growing belief in Teheran that its showdown with the international community could end in air strikes by America or Israel. "Iran's leaders are clearly preparing for a confrontation by going underground," said Alireza Jafarzadeh, the NCRI official who made the 2002 announcement.

America and Europe believe that Iran is secretly trying to acquire an atomic bomb, although the regime insists that its nuclear programme is for civilian energy purposes.

As the United Nations Security Council prepares to discuss Iran's nuclear operations this week, Teheran has been stepping up plans for confrontation. Its chief delegate on nuclear talks last week threatened that Iran would inflict "harm and pain" on America if censured by the Security Council.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the hardline president who has called for Israel to be "wiped off the map", also said that the West would "suffer" if it tried to thwart Iran's nuclear ambitions. As the war of words intensified, President George W Bush said that Teheran represents a "grave national security concern" for America.

In Iraq, which Mr Ahmadinejad hopes will develop into a fellow Shia Islamic state, Iran is already using its proxy militia to attack British and American forces, often with Iranian-made bombs and weapons. As tensions grow, Teheran could order Hizbollah - the Lebanese-based terror faction that it created and arms - to attack targets in Israel.

The regime is also reviewing its contingency plans to attack tankers and American naval forces in the Persian Gulf and to mine the Strait of Hormuz, through which about 15 million barrels of oil (about 20 per cent of world production) passes each day. Any action in the Gulf would send oil prices soaring - a weapon that Iran has often threatened to wield.

The Pentagon's strategic planning is focused on the danger that Iran might try to mine the strait and deploy explosive-packed suicide boats against its warships. In May, American vessels in the Gulf will take part in the Arabian Gauntlet training exercise that deals with clearing mines from the strait, which has a navigable channel just two miles wide.

The naval wing of the Revolutionary Guard has in recent years practised "swarming" raids, using its flotilla of small rapid-attack boats to simulate assaults on commercial vessels and United States warships, according to Ken Timmerman, an American expert on Iran.

The Pentagon is particularly sensitive to the dangers of such attacks after al-Qaeda hit the USS Cole off the Yemen with a suicide boat in 2000, killing 17 American sailors. Last month the White House listed two foiled al-Qaeda plots to attack ships in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz.

US intelligence believes that if Iranian nuclear facilities were attacked by either America or Israel, then Teheran would respond by trying to close the Strait of Hormuz with naval forces, mines and anti-ship cruise missiles.

"When these systems become fully operational, they will significantly enhance Iran's defensive capabilities and ability to deny access to the Persian Gulf through the Strait of Hormuz," Michael Maples, the director of the Defence Intelligence Agency testified before the Senate armed services committee last month.

A senior American intelligence officer said that the US navy would be able to reopen the strait but that it would be militarily costly. Hamid Reza Zakeri, a former Iranian intelligence officer, recently told Mr Timmerman that the Iranian navy's Strategic Studies Centre has produced an updated battle plan for the strait.

Its most devastating options would be to use its long-range Shahab-3 missiles to attack Israeli or American bases in the region or to deploy suicide bombers in Western cities under its strategy of "asymmetric" response.

"The price to the West for standing up to Iran is clear," Gen Moshe Ya'alon, the former Israeli defence chief said last month in Washington. "It includes terror attacks, economic hardship… and consequences resulting from fluctuations in Iranian oil production. Indeed, the regime believes that the West - including Israel - is afraid to deal with it."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: builds; complex; iran; irannukes; nuclear; rise; secret; tensions; underground
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 03/11/2006 5:14:36 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

2 posted on 03/11/2006 5:17:13 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

US Navy planes to use large shells to combat Iranian small boats


3 posted on 03/11/2006 5:18:21 PM PST by bybybill (If the Rats win, we are doomed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger

ping


4 posted on 03/11/2006 5:21:55 PM PST by NautiNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

bttt


5 posted on 03/11/2006 5:28:28 PM PST by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

Very interesting, i wonder if they would retaliate that much? they expected similar with iraq but nothing really happened.


6 posted on 03/11/2006 5:28:55 PM PST by rhainw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam

Just lovely!

Swarming raids.....LOL!


7 posted on 03/11/2006 5:32:06 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

The complex can't be that secret if its being reported about in the news.


8 posted on 03/11/2006 5:32:57 PM PST by puppypusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I don't quite understand how we know so much about them, and if this is accurate, why we are just standing by waiting for them to build up their forces even more. I know our current policy, as announced by Secy Rice, is that we hope to destabilize their regime by encouraging dissidents within the country. It seems to me that (even if these dissidents exist in numbers great enough to make a difference) this would take awhile, and it hardly seems that Iran is going to sit around and wait for it.


9 posted on 03/11/2006 5:33:53 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: puppypusher
Judging from our last war, news publications about their "secret" underground complexes is a pretty sure sign that conflict is nigh.
10 posted on 03/11/2006 5:34:27 PM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam
How the US can cause harm on itty bitty boats:

One 50 cal

Don't need anything too sophisticated.
11 posted on 03/11/2006 5:34:59 PM PST by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: livius

Telling them we know what they are doing causes chaos and replanning in their ranks.


12 posted on 03/11/2006 5:36:08 PM PST by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

That's a good point.


13 posted on 03/11/2006 5:39:08 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blam

The ultimate answer to underground bunkers.

14 posted on 03/11/2006 5:39:33 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Real Leaders Base Their Decisions on Their Convictions. Wannabes Base Decisions on the Latest Poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

If the word is out that a secret complex is being built then someone knows where it is. If someone knows where it is, so does Israel and probably the US too.


15 posted on 03/11/2006 5:40:53 PM PST by fish hawk (TU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

What are we waiting for? Attack Iran now.


16 posted on 03/11/2006 5:48:34 PM PST by SIDENET (Anything woth fighting for is worth fighting dirty for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius
"It seems to me that (even if these dissidents exist in numbers great enough to make a difference) this would take awhile, and it hardly seems that Iran is going to sit around and wait for it."

Yup. Many FReepers have expressed the same sentiment. By the time internal dissent may have an effect, they'd have nuclear weapons. So... (Smoke & Mirrors by Rice?)

17 posted on 03/11/2006 5:49:54 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
"How the US can cause harm on itty bitty boats:"

I expect Warthogs will work as well against boats as they do tanks, huh?

18 posted on 03/11/2006 5:52:17 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blam

If you are looking to mulch them, yes.


19 posted on 03/11/2006 6:00:10 PM PST by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: blam
Wow! Those "swarming" Revolutionary Guard rapid attack boats are going to get a really nasty surprise when they encounter the US Navy's Block 1B Phalanx CIWS.

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/weaps/mk-15.htm

20 posted on 03/11/2006 6:02:24 PM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson