Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConsentofGoverned
War is or should be an all or none job

Actually historically speaking, that sort of thing is an aberration. WW-II was like that, but most wars are not. Military officers study Carl von Clausewitz, who said "War is not an independent phenomenon, but the continuation of politics by different means" . . In a little longer expositioin he wrote "If war is part of policy, policy will determine its character. As policy becomes more ambitious and vigorous, so will war, and this may reach the point where war attains its absolute form. . . . Policy is the guiding intelligence and war only the instrument, not vice versa."

The war must be fought in such as way as to further the political goals for which it is being fought.That is true even when one is attacked and responding to that attack. of course the relationship is mutual and the politics (that is policy) must support the war effort as well.

47 posted on 03/12/2006 8:53:19 AM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato
well written and I agree..now what goal is served by allowing Syria and Iran a free hand in spoiling Iraq?
American Diplomacy is rooted in the detente of the cold war..
Much time, wealth, and lives are wasted if your goals are too limited for your use of war..

War by it's very nature must be worth the goal..

Do any of us understand the ultimate goal here? and is it worth the lives spent? I think it is, but the goal seems to be getting fuzzy.
50 posted on 03/12/2006 9:08:43 AM PST by ConsentofGoverned (if a sucker is born every minute, what are the voters?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson