Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Military: 8 Elite Law Schools: 0 (How did so many professors misunderstand the law?)
The Weekly Standard ^ | March 20, 2006 | Peter Berkowitz

Posted on 03/12/2006 3:14:02 PM PST by RWR8189

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 03/12/2006 3:14:08 PM PST by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Dunce caps for the profs! Boy, to be a young smartalec in my ConLaw class again.
2 posted on 03/12/2006 3:16:04 PM PST by JAWs (Ytringsfrihed er ytringsfrihed er ytringsfrihed. Der er intet men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Another example of what happens to people who "FEEL" rather then "THINK" their politics.


3 posted on 03/12/2006 3:16:31 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Are you not entertained? Are you NOT entertained? Is this not what you came here for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Wishful thinking ususally clouds your judgement. The law profs have the same problem with the 2nd Amendment as the 1st. It really doesn't mean what they wish it meant. Boo Hoo.


4 posted on 03/12/2006 3:18:39 PM PST by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

HA! Reaping Havoc EVERYWHERE TODAY!

shouldn't you be reading some posts, Mr Grim!???

(ducking and running......)


5 posted on 03/12/2006 3:22:11 PM PST by eeevil conservative (beware of MR GRIM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
How did so many professors misunderstand the law?

Did they misunderstand the law or did they just try to subvert it for their own ends? These "professors" have not been teaching law as it is. They have been teaching and advocating law as they want it to be. For too long they have been able to push their brand of law with the aid of judges who were sympathetic to their causes.

6 posted on 03/12/2006 3:24:26 PM PST by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Many of them are so used to having their way they forget they are there to teach.


7 posted on 03/12/2006 3:24:40 PM PST by jazusamo (:Gregory was riled while Hume smiled:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Mike Ramirez rules.

8 posted on 03/12/2006 3:26:12 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

OK, that was too long to read, anybody got the Cliff notes?


9 posted on 03/12/2006 3:26:16 PM PST by SAMS (Nobody loves a soldier until the enemy is at the gate; Army Wife & Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
However, Roberts's opinion does give rise to, and leaves unresolved, one nonlegal but rather large and disturbing question: How could so many law professors of such high rank and distinction be so wrong about such straightforward issues of constitutional law?

Perfectly simple. Over the past 40 years or more, these elite professors have persuaded themselves that the law means whatever they want it to mean.

In fact this kind of approach, called "critical legal theory" at Harvard (although they would give a more "nuanced" explanation of what that means), goes all the way back to Oliver Wendell Holmes, the first Justice to argue that the law means whatever we want to to mean.

"We" being the elite and privileged and powerful, who run such places as Harvard and Yale Law schools. Similarly "we" in the journalism business means people who went to the Columbia School of Journalism or work for the New York Times.

And people were complaining that Roberts is an elitist.

10 posted on 03/12/2006 3:27:04 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Today's law schools have become radicalized...they no longer know or teach "The Law" so much as they teach ideology.

...which means that current law schools students are receiving a lousy legal education.

11 posted on 03/12/2006 3:27:23 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

I hear that the left wingers will respond by posting all sorts of literature about how discriminatory the US Armed Forces are. I hope the College Republicans will post counter-literature about how these left wingers don't give a damn about the homophobia that exists in non-Western nations.

It appears that if some young kid is thinking of joining the military, these left wing academics would try to convince the kid not to join because of "don't ask, don't tell". So that means the left wing academics think that NOBODY should join the military, which means that we wouldn't have a military. Why do I get the feeling that they would feel this way regardless of "don't ask, don't tell"?


12 posted on 03/12/2006 3:29:47 PM PST by The Fop (Marxism was built for the West but the West rejected it, and hell hath no fury like a woman scorned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreePaul
Did they misunderstand the law or did they just try to subvert it for their own ends?

Exactly... that is why they are freaking out about the last two Presidential elections. Say what you will about George Bush, but at least he is making a difference in the long term direction of the courts.

13 posted on 03/12/2006 3:32:40 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Chief Justice Roberts is becoming my hero.

If George W. Bush had never done another thing, the fact that he got Roberts and Alito on the supreme court puts him right under Reagan in my book.

I know sometimes we get disappointed in what's happening...and then later we find out President Bush just played "rope-a-dope" on the liberals and they fell for it.

I think he'll be smiling when all the new info from Saddam's documents finally comes out.

14 posted on 03/12/2006 3:33:29 PM PST by capt. norm (Error: Keyboard not attached. Press F1 to continue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

If they don't comply immediately, federal funding should be cut off immediately. The universities should also pay back money collected from us taxpayers in the past, during the periods of non-compliance.


15 posted on 03/12/2006 3:35:26 PM PST by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

What this article reveals is the deep cynicism of the leaders of American law faculties with respect to the law. Clearly, in this article, we see how the leading minds of our legal academies see the law as a blunt force weapon to bludgeon the nation into submission to their wacky liberal notions. A pox on their campuses.


16 posted on 03/12/2006 3:42:28 PM PST by Juan Medén
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
And the really infuriating thing about all this?

The government will still take Republicans' tax money so that these laws schools can take a big crap on Republicans in the class room.

If anything it should be Republicans bringing suit against these schools for forcing Republicans to fund anti-Republican speech.

17 posted on 03/12/2006 3:43:15 PM PST by mc6809e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Juan Medén

Forget the legislative branch, and what the people want their representatives to do. All hail the black robed priests and their agenda! /sarcasm


18 posted on 03/12/2006 3:46:58 PM PST by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
How did so many professors misunderstand the law?

Easy – they are all elite law school professors and no one has ever dared to question their expert opinion.
19 posted on 03/12/2006 3:48:48 PM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm
If George W. Bush had never done another thing, the fact that he got Roberts and Alito on the supreme court puts him right under Reagan in my book.

The only thing that keeps from being even a better (if not greater) President than Reagan is him unfortunate attitude about immigration. IMO

20 posted on 03/12/2006 3:59:47 PM PST by chesley (Liberals...what's not to loathe?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson