Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tapes reveal WMD plans by Saddam (Rowan Scarborough)
The Washington Times ^ | 3-13-06 | Rowan Scarborough

Posted on 03/12/2006 10:29:27 PM PST by smoothsailing

Tapes reveal WMD plans by Saddam

By Rowan Scarborough

THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Published March 13, 2006

Audiotapes of Saddam Hussein and his aides underscore the Bush administration's argument that Baghdad was determined to rebuild its arsenal of weapons of mass destruction once the international community had tired of inspections and left the Iraqi dictator alone.     

In addition to the captured tapes, U.S. officials are analyzing thousands of pages of newly translated Iraqi documents that tell of Saddam seeking uranium from Africa in the mid-1990s.     

The documents also speak of burying prohibited missiles, according to a government official familiar with the declassification process.     

But it is not clear whether Baghdad did what the documents indicate, said the U.S. official, who asked not to be named.     

"The factories are present," an Iraqi aide tells Saddam on one of the tapes, made by the dictator in the mid-1990s while U.N. weapons inspectors were searching for Baghdad's remaining stocks of weapons of mass destruction.     

"The factories remain, in the mind they remain. Our spirit is with us, based solely on the time period," the aide says, according to the documents. "And [inspectors] take note of the time period, they can't account for our will."     

The quote is from roughly 12 hours of taped conversations that unexpectedly landed in the lap of Bill Tierney, a former Army warrant officer and Arabic speaker who was translating for the FBI tapes unearthed in Iraq after the invasion.     

Mr. Tierney made a copy, which he provided to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. The committee in turn gave a copy to intelligence analysts who authenticated the voice as that of Saddam.     

Mr. Tierney said that the quote from the Saddam aide, and scores of others, show Saddam was rebuilding his once-ample weapons stocks.     

"The tapes show...

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: billtierney; cialeak; demoratseatmoonbats; demoratshipsinking; demorattraitors; donkeysarejackasses; gnfi; hussein; iraq; iraqdocs; jackasswilson; kerryliedandlies; plame; russertlovessaddam; russertpayedbysaddam; saddam; saddamhussein; saddamtapes; tierney; wmd; wmdmovedtosyria; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: advance_copy

Quote taken from the speech to the nation by Bill Clinton on December 16, 1998.


21 posted on 03/13/2006 3:17:47 AM PST by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

WMD ping


22 posted on 03/13/2006 3:26:10 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Peach

I keep hearing of these satellite photos of trailer truck convoys going into Syria just before the American invasion .Why cant we see these photos?


23 posted on 03/13/2006 4:01:12 AM PST by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ballplayer

They're classified, of course.


24 posted on 03/13/2006 4:17:53 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ballplayer

I see that someone said the photos are classified.

That's not quite correct. Colin Powell showed them to the UN Security Council in the fall of 2002 and they were viewed on live television.


25 posted on 03/13/2006 4:31:09 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

This made for a nice front-page headline while browsing at the local 7-11 this morning.


26 posted on 03/13/2006 4:58:51 AM PST by Coop (FR= a lotta talk, but little action - now do you know what my tagline means?!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Colin Powell showed them to the UN Security Council in the fall of 2002...

That doesn't mean that they aren't still classified.

In many cases, the classification depends on the resolution of the photograph. A low resolution version might not be classified, but a high resolution version will almost certainly be, if only for the fact that the degree of resolution reveals as much about our capabilities as they do about the actual subject of the photo.

Pictures of trucks don't mean much unless you also have pictures of identifiable material being loaded into the trucks or being unloaded at the destination. In the months leading up to the invasion, you can be darn well sure we were doing every possible form of satellite surveillance of Iraq. The pictures we would really want to see almost certainly exist and are guaranteed to be classified. Powell would have never had these photos at the UN.

Having said all that, always remember-this is the government. Logic need not apply.

27 posted on 03/13/2006 5:17:34 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
the evil Bush was just miffed because Saddam tried to off his daddy.

Which, BTW, is an act of war in most people's eyes. Just MHO.

28 posted on 03/13/2006 5:38:13 AM PST by Hardastarboard (HEY - Billy Joe! You ARE an American Idiot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

That's true.


29 posted on 03/13/2006 5:41:15 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind
This is one of the photos Sec. Powell showed the UN:


30 posted on 03/13/2006 5:51:56 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ballplayer

When does this white house start playing the tapes of Yariq Aziz spilling his guts on everything Sadam was up to.This slow dip info could take years.Aziz knows it all.Get him front and center before the msm and be done with it.


31 posted on 03/13/2006 6:18:18 AM PST by magua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Herford Turley

dems are slowing fanning their fingertips on their bottom, drooling lip:
Dems: "Oh yeah? Well whadabout Cheney shootin' that guy in Texas!!! Impeach him! :)


32 posted on 03/13/2006 6:24:42 AM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

Then something happened that Col. McMaster had not planned for: Politicians in Baghdad forced a delay of three more days, apparently concerned about civilian casualties.

Ware says to the soldiers, he was with it looked like the delay gave al Qaeda time to escape.

"The al Qaeda presence in Tal Afar was surrounded. And the attack was primed. And then it was stopped dead in its tracks. And so, as the troops I was with battled throughout the day and into the night with al Qaeda fighters so close you could throw a stone and hit them, when we woke up the next morning — poof — they were gone!" says Ware.


This is why Iraq is a mess, and because of politicians it is why we havent won a real "war" since ww2.


33 posted on 03/13/2006 6:28:56 AM PST by Btrp113Cav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Btrp113Cav

"This is why Iraq is a mess, and because of politicians it is why we havent won a real "war" since ww2."

Not sure why you replied as you did. But, thought I would make a remark about our occupation and its conduct. I'm reading a book by an former military intell officer who aptly remarked that the civilian leaders (i.e. undersecretaries) with no prior military experience that are running the show are like "virgins writing sex manuals."


34 posted on 03/13/2006 6:35:00 AM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Wait a minute ... this weekend on ABC's evening news Bill Wier (or, whatever his name) stated clearly that Saddam didn't have weapons of mass destruction, that he only said he did to intimidate Iran. Wier was so sincere ... which, given the facts to the contrary, makes Wier one liberal dumb sum-of-a-b****.
35 posted on 03/13/2006 6:36:51 AM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
From the article:

  "Terrorism is coming ... with the Americans," Saddam said. "With the Americans, two years ago, not a long while ago, with the English I believe, there was a campaign ... with one of them, that in the future there would be terrorism with weapons of mass destruction."
...
 Of the tapes released so far, Mr. Hoekstra said, "Everything [Saddam] is doing is saying, 'Let's take it and hide it' with a clear intent. 'As soon as this is over, we're going to be back after this.' "
...
Mr. Duelfer concluded that Saddam planned to resume weapons of mass destruction production once the United Nations lifted economic sanctions.

36 posted on 03/13/2006 6:50:04 AM PST by Ooh-Ah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
The issue wasn't that Saddam had WMD's, but whether or not he had Stockpiles. This means, he had to have had his WMD's piled in a specific arrangment, to a certain height.

If there were no Stockpiles, then Bush lied, and troops died.

37 posted on 03/13/2006 7:00:11 AM PST by C210N (Bush SPYED, Terrorists DIED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Page 32Z?


38 posted on 03/13/2006 7:21:52 AM PST by freema (Proud Marine FRiend, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N
The issue wasn't that Saddam had WMD's, but whether or not he had Stockpiles. This means, he had to have had his WMD's piled in a specific arrangment, to a certain height.

If there were no Stockpiles, then Bush lied, and troops died.

Three questions:

Are you saying Saddam was innocent if he had moved his stockpiles?

Do you think his capabilities and plans for future WMD's, when the coast was clear, were irrelevant?

And, do you also believe the "Oil-for-Food" money bought food for starving women and children?


39 posted on 03/13/2006 7:22:42 AM PST by Ooh-Ah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
This is too difficult for the Mainstream Media to dig into and digest. It will require a lot of work and analysis.

Instead, if we want to discuss boring stuff like WMDs, let's talk about how Bush and Cheney lied and illegally exposed Valerie Plame...

40 posted on 03/13/2006 7:24:55 AM PST by Gritty (Five years after 9/11, it's astonishing how little we still know about the West's Muslims-Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson