Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rather: Public Trust In Media Threatened (“I’m not an icon. I can be arrogant and conceited.”)
Harvard Crimson ^ | Friday, March 10, 2006 | CLAIRE M. GUEHENNO

Posted on 03/13/2006 10:01:12 AM PST by presidio9

Legendary broadcast journalist Dan Rather told a packed John F. Kennedy Jr. Forum last night that Comedy Central host Jon Stewart offers “another dimension to the American experience.”

“I like him. I like the program,” Rather told a smiling Alex S. Jones, his interlocutor for the evening.

After this cheerful beginning, Rather went on to address some of the tougher problems facing the media today, focusing on the market pressures which affect the quality of broadcast news.

“Ratings no longer are king. Demographics are,” Rather said, noting that even shows with high ratings can now be taken off the air for demographic reasons.

The long-time CBS News anchorman, who retired from his post last spring after more than half a century in the press, described the news as a “public trust.” He emphasized the media’s obligation to public service, which he said “has gone badly out of fashion and is in very near danger of disappearing.”

He added, playfully, “In many ways CBS is better than some, but that’s a subject for another time.”

Jones, who is director of the Shorenstein Center on Press, Politics and Public Policy, described Rather as an icon and as a man who “speaks his mind.”

“The president sassed him and he sassed him back,” Jones said in his opening remarks.

While Rather denied having “sassed” any president, he agreed that he “tried to stand [his] ground.”

“I’m not an icon,” Rather said. “I can be arrogant and conceited.”

A heated question-and-answer session followed Rather’s comments.

Addressing the media’s influence, Rather said he was both aware of his power and afraid of it.

“As hard as you try it’s impossible not to understand that in some ways you can make a difference,” Rather said, referring to his years as one of the most familiar faces of American news.

One audience member asked Rather about the media’s ability to balance national security interests with the public’s right to know.

Rather said he thought sensitive information should be printed and that the burden ought to be placed on the government to prove why information should not be printed.

Of the recent controversial Danish cartoons, Rather said that while he thinks the Danish newspaper was right to publish them, “it might not have been the right thing for everybody, everywhere.”

“I’ve seen politicians speak and it was clear that Rather was very aware of his audience and he was speaking closely to the questions,” said Patrick A. Schneiter, an Extension School student who attended the talk.

The event was organized by the Institute of Politics (IOP) and co-sponsored by the Shorenstein Center.

“I thought Dan Rather was very honest and very responsive to the questions,” said Jeanne Shaheen, the director of the IOP.

Rather was invited to speak by Dotty Lynch, an IOP fellow and political editor at CBS News.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: danrather; fakebutaccurate; wtfk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: HEY4QDEMS

Rather comes out as a madman bent on the destruction of the President in Sammon's book, Strategery.


21 posted on 03/13/2006 10:39:12 AM PST by OldFriend (HELL IS TOO GOOD FOR OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Now this is a hard-hitting piece that the future LibCom "journalists" can be proud of! Wonder if any conservative has ever been invited to speak to this Lefty group, and what the coverage of that event would be. This is, in reality, a parody of Harvard itself. In this bastion of tolerance, there is no tolerance of an opposing viewpoint.


22 posted on 03/13/2006 10:49:11 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
he “tried to stand [his] ground.”

Hey Rather...your job is to read the news not be a self important inventor of agenda driven "stories."

23 posted on 03/13/2006 10:56:18 AM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

The way this man sucked up to dictators and despots was sickening and disgusting. He should have long ago dropped any pretense of objectivity and fairness and called himself what he really was - a partisan democrat who used his position of power to influence national politics and social policy.


24 posted on 03/13/2006 10:59:52 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Darwinism is a belief in the meaninglessness of existence - R. Kirk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

25 posted on 03/13/2006 11:10:21 AM PST by MarineBrat (Talk is cheap because supply exceeds demand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
While Rather denied having “sassed” any president...

What about that teté â teté with Bush I some years ago, that he later proclaimed to be "good old fashioned advocacy journalism"?

CA....

26 posted on 03/13/2006 12:37:29 PM PST by Chances Are (Whew! It seems I've once again found that silly grin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
“Ratings no longer are king. Demographics are,” Rather said

Sharp as an orange.

27 posted on 03/13/2006 12:38:36 PM PST by Windsong (Jesus Saves, but Buddha makes incremental backups)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"...Rather went on to address some of the tougher problems facing the media today"

.... so of course the rigorous Harvard scholars pressed him forcefully for a full accounting of his role in the infamous "Rathergate" foisting of blatant forgeries on the American public just weeks before a national election. The very thorough and objective Harvard scholars would not let Rather depart without an exhaustive examination of his central role in one of the worst journalistic frauds in US history.....

Oh, wait, I guess we didn't see that in this article, how could the reporter have missed the great truth-seeking Harvard scholars, who always uphold that university's mottos of "VERITAS"?????? Surely it's not because the Harvard scholars did not actually challenge Dan Blather to give a truthful accounting of his fraud????
28 posted on 03/13/2006 8:13:04 PM PST by Enchante (Democrats: "We are ALL broken and worn out, our party & ideas, what else is new?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
Rather was invited to speak by Dotty Lynch, an IOP fellow traveler and political editor at CBS News.
29 posted on 03/14/2006 11:57:39 AM PST by AwesomePossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Be nice if the news readers would have their IQ's tested with the results released.


30 posted on 03/18/2006 9:14:36 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson