Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Drammach

One of the first Scientific American articles I can remember reading.

Used to sell seeds door to door in the spring to buy them.

I wouldn't spend a plugged nickel on the new, revamped, ultra politically correct SciAm's now.


21 posted on 03/16/2006 1:34:50 AM PST by djf (I'm not Islamophobic. But I am bombophobic! If that's the same, freakin deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: djf

Politically correct??
You probably missed the current articles concerning creationists and ethics?

They ferociously attack creationists (im not a creationists) to the point that you begin to wonder why the editors waste their time on it instead of publishing something about, i dont know, SCIENCE?!

Even worse, the editors seem to enjoy putting the word "ethics" between quotations every time they use it, and they have even insinuated that ethics are all made up by opponents of science..

I don't read sciam anymore anyway, they report more and more about politics and how existence is pointless so nothing matters and less and less about science.
I suggest newscientist, although it rather lacks details in it's articles even more than sciam.


22 posted on 03/16/2006 2:48:59 AM PST by S0122017
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson