Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fossil find prompts rethink on dinosaur feathers
Yahoo (Reuters) ^ | 3/15/2006 | Patricia Reaney

Posted on 03/15/2006 12:23:34 PM PST by The_Victor

LONDON (Reuters) - A newly discovered, perfectly preserved fossil of a 150 million-year-old dinosaur found in southern Germany may force scientists to rethink how and when feathers evolved.

The nearly complete remains of the chicken-size dinosaur named Juravenator, which is described in the journal Nature on Wednesday, were preserved in limestone. But unlike other members of the group of two-legged meat-eating predators known as coelurosaurs, it had no feathers.

"It is an absolutely new dinosaur that was not known before," said Ursula Gohlich, a palaeontologist at the University of Munich in Germany.

Remains of small dinosaurs from the Late Jurassic period are rare finds. The new fossil is nearly complete, apart from a missing part of its long tail, and shows soft tissue and an imprint of the skin but no feathers.

"Scientists had thought that all representatives of the group coelurosaurs should have feathers," Gohlich told Reuters.

"Now we have a little dinosaur that belongs to coelurosaurs that does not show feathers. This is a problem."

COMPLEX EVOLUTION

Feathers were thought to have evolved very early within coelurosaurs. All members of the group were thought to be feathered.

But Gohlich and Luis Chiappe, of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County in California, believe the evolution of feathers may be more complex than previously thought.

Feathers may have evolved early but then were replaced by scales in some creatures because they were not needed.

"Another possibility perhaps is that some representatives of coelurosaurs were not entirely covered with feathers, only certain areas," said Gohlich.

The newly discovered Juravenator was very young so may not have lived long enough to develop feathers. But Gohlich said that despite its age, she would have expected it to have had feathers.

"We think that feathers evolved. We have several fossils that support this theory. But our fossil asks some questions," she added.

The oldest known bird, Archaeopteryx, was also found in southern Germany. It too lived about 150 million years ago and had feathers but it is uncertain whether they were used to fly or to keep warm.

Xing Xu, of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, said whatever the explanation, the discovery of Juravenator has enriched knowledge of early feather evolution. It could also indicate where future research could be concentrated.

"Juravenator may complicate the picture, but it makes it more complete and realistic," he said in a commentary in the journal.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: crevolist; evolution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
Time for another revision to the "family" tree.
1 posted on 03/15/2006 12:23:36 PM PST by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

ping


2 posted on 03/15/2006 12:24:43 PM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

Weel, that ought to put a feather in the evolutionist's caps......


3 posted on 03/15/2006 12:25:20 PM PST by Red Badger (And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

4 posted on 03/15/2006 12:28:54 PM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

However, records in Chicago indicate it voted for Kerry in 2004...


5 posted on 03/15/2006 12:29:35 PM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
However, records in Chicago indicate it voted for Kerry in 2004...

That would be about right for the amount of brainpower....

Birds of a feather doncha know.....

6 posted on 03/15/2006 12:31:37 PM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
We think that feathers evolved. We have several fossils that support this theory. But our fossil asks some questions

In other words, they don't know anything.

7 posted on 03/15/2006 12:32:56 PM PST by mtbopfuyn (Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn
But our fossil asks some questions

Image Hosted by The Image Hosting

8 posted on 03/15/2006 12:38:30 PM PST by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
Feathers may have evolved early but then were replaced by scales in some creatures because they were not needed.

Humans may evolve organs that allow us to breathe liquid gold. But these organs may eventually disappear from the human race, because they are not needed.

Is that how evolution works?

9 posted on 03/15/2006 12:39:56 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (Never question Bruce Dickinson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

No.


10 posted on 03/15/2006 12:40:28 PM PST by trashcanbred (Anti-social and anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

" chicken-size dinosaur"
Are they good-eatin'?


11 posted on 03/15/2006 12:41:45 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
"Scientists had thought that all representatives of the group coelurosaurs should have feathers," Gohlich told Reuters.

Maybe he was a 'plucker'.


12 posted on 03/15/2006 12:43:08 PM PST by Ol' Dan Tucker (Karen Ryan reporting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
Woody Allen will have to produce a revised edition of his book Without Feathers.
13 posted on 03/15/2006 12:43:08 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
Evolution Ping

The List-O-Links
A conservative, pro-evolution science list, now with over 350 names.
See the list's explanation, then FReepmail to be added or dropped.
To assist beginners: But it's "just a theory", Evo-Troll's Toolkit,
and How to argue against a scientific theory.

14 posted on 03/15/2006 12:43:14 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
" chicken-size dinosaur" Are they good-eatin'?

Initially I thought, "not any more," but I hear stone soup is pretty good.

15 posted on 03/15/2006 12:43:26 PM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

Revelation 4:11Intelligent Design
Constantly searching for objectivity in the evolution debate...
See my profile for info


16 posted on 03/15/2006 12:45:09 PM PST by wallcrawlr (http://www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

Not found in China? If unique to Europe this might explain some folk tales.


17 posted on 03/15/2006 12:47:03 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

> Time for another revision to the "family" tree.

Yup. Wonderful thing, science. It incorporates new evidence, rather than just closing its eyes, sticking its fingers in its ears and humming real loud.


18 posted on 03/15/2006 12:47:27 PM PST by orionblamblam (A furore Normannorum libra nos, Domine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
" chicken-size dinosaur"

Are they good-eatin'?

And they taste like? Well, you know. Placemarker.

19 posted on 03/15/2006 12:47:49 PM PST by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

I thought feathers evolved to satisfy a costume need in burlesque theater.


20 posted on 03/15/2006 12:48:17 PM PST by Buck W. (John Kerry: The Emir of Absurdistan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson