Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheSpottedOwl
Technically she is married to him byway of common law.

She wasn't when she made her first baby with him. It also happens that Florida hasn't recognized common-law marriages since 1968, so technically they were not common-law married at any point in time.

Technically she is married to him byway of common law.

Technically she is not, per Florida statute section 741.211.

Maybe she's embarassed for being abandoned after all that time.

Embarrassment didn't stop her from finding at least one other man to make babies with. A person with a half a brain would say, "Gee, if my 'fiancé' would dump me after ten years or so, maybe I shouldn't be opening my knees to another baby-maker without a wedding ring?"

130 posted on 03/16/2006 10:10:38 AM PST by Shalom Israel (There's a reason cows ain't extinct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]


To: Shalom Israel

I believe I said "many states". I wasn't sure whether Florida recognized common law marriage.

Why is everyone assuming that that she had another relationship after her children's father left?


151 posted on 03/16/2006 5:20:49 PM PST by TheSpottedOwl ("Life is a box of chocolates. Eat them before they eat you ".---me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson