Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dominic Harr
You "helped" America ignore the evidence and make an emotional decision that went against the evidence.

When presented with the fact that DHS and USCG raised objections based upon national security concerns, you cover your eyes, denying it happened. What do you call that?

198 posted on 03/17/2006 11:00:57 AM PST by La Enchiladita (Normally 1/2 Irish ancestry, but today I'll take it all! Happy St. Patrick's Day to my FRamily!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]


To: La Enchiladita

I call it Free traitor globalism.


201 posted on 03/17/2006 11:03:56 AM PST by TXBSAFH (Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

To: La Enchiladita
When presented with the fact that DHS and USCG raised objections based upon national security concerns, you cover your eyes, denying it happened.

No, I pointed out that the USCG's objection was that they didn't think they could find evidence when vetting UAE.

An objection they dropped.

You seem to be very quick to mis-represent what others say.

There is evidence the UAE is a trustworthy ally. There is *no* evidence suggesting they are dangerous to US port security.

202 posted on 03/17/2006 11:05:01 AM PST by Dominic Harr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson