To: Libloather
" As for that fashionable "body art" that the military still calls a tattoo, having one is grounds for rejection, too."
Wow, the only people in my extended family who have tattoos are veterans - it's weird that current regulations would exclude them. They have to drop that rule if they ever institute a draft or everybody who wants to dodge will get ink.
8 posted on
03/16/2006 5:38:37 PM PST by
gondramB
(Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's.)
To: gondramB
Wow, the only people in my extended family who have tattoos are veterans - it's weird that current regulations would exclude them. WTF? Do they have them on their FACES or something? If they are the traditional military tatoos on the upper arms, shoulder, or torso, then they are not "excluded by current regulations."
On the other hand, if they look like this guy, then frankly they deserve to be excluded.
24 posted on
03/16/2006 6:17:24 PM PST by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: gondramB
They have to drop that rule if they ever institute a draft or everybody who wants to dodge will get ink.Or smoke a joint.
56 posted on
03/17/2006 8:08:32 AM PST by
flada
(Posting in a manner reminiscent of Jen-gis Kahn.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson