Posted on 03/17/2006 7:44:21 AM PST by Calpernia
We've heard Dems argue that the TANG files were fake, but accurate, perhaps these are...
True, but inaccurate????
I hate to be a party pooper, but nothing in that document indicates that AQ was in Iraq at the request of or with the consent of the Iraqi government of that they were acting in concert or conspiring to act in concert. Indeed, AQ is currently active in our Country, but that doesn't make us allies.
Oh yeah? You can read this?
http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents-docex/Iraq/ISGZ-2004-019920.pdf
What does it say?
That will be just about it!!
The talk show radios are bringing it up. I think it will viral.
I'm trying to catch up now and it's just been a few days. Is there a ringleader, ping list, clearinghouse thread?
"No, they told us that Al Qaeda was against Saddam because he was a secular ruler, therefore Saddam couldn't have been working with Al Qaeda against the US."
Which of course is false. After the first Gulf War Saddam made a concerted effort to build up his Islamic bonifides. As I recall, he made a big deal about having a Koran written up with the Arabic script in his blood and he also added the word Allah to flag of Iraq. He saw the power of religion fervor and wanted to harness that for his own goals. Saddam himself may not have been an Islamist but he had no problems manipulating religion for his own purposes and toward that end started to cultivate religious fundamentalism among Sunni groups after the first Gulf War. Saddam was an opportunist. On the other hand, the claim that Islamists of any flavor are oppossed to cooperating with secular or non-Islamic governments clearly false.
Blogs would have Michelle Malkin as a good starting point, Pajamas Media may be starting something....lots of action.
See link at #55 also.
Furthermore not aggressively defending the truth that al Qeade associates were certainly in Iraq and operating there prior to OIF. Some of our initial Ops of OIF were dealing with this reality.
I disagree. I'm one of the GNFI/Procoalition ping list holders here at FR. They release so much information, I can't keep up with posting it.
Look to the MSM for not carrying their releases.
You are so right! My Bad
Too bad the RINO's won't allow the "white flag" ad to be run again on TV
Pass this "white flag" ad from Dec 2005 around on the internet, it's from gop.com
http://www.gop.com/Media/120905.wmv
At least gop.com has not been taken over by the RINO's!
"What does the Arabic say at the bottom of the picture?"
Calp...my Arabic is a bit rusty but I'm pretty sure it says "Jihadist available and wants to meet like-minded islamic-fascist woman for long term relationship focusing on death to infidels. I only have one leg, so I won't run out on you...please call xxx-xx-0000"
See link at post #6 for ping list.
You are dead-on right.
It say's "I like anchovies on my pizza."
Look to the MSM for not carrying their releases.
I hear you here - But the reality of the matter is the GOP and WH know where the MSM job is at (and that is supporting DEM's) therefore that excuse just doesn't hold water.
We are asking our soldiers to fight 24/7 in some of the worst conditions imaginable.....the least the WH and GOP could do here at home is fight just as hard 24/7 to ensure the truth of their mission gets out.
"The MSM won't do it for us" just doesn't cut it. We don't allow those type excuses out of our warriors in the field....and I expect more then excuses out of my CIC along with those in the GOP Congress.
The reality is the WH nor the GOP have been effective, nor aggressive enough at keeping the truth out there for the American public.
Releasing information that never makes its way to the general public isn't good enough after 3 years of seeing it isn't an effective mechanism for getting your message out.
They have created other outlets to get their info out. That includes their own broadcasts, websites and prompted up news casters.
Sorry, if their weren't other outlets, we wouldn't know any of this information.
Well, if you don't know what this says:
http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents-docex/Iraq/ISGZ-2004-019920.pdf
On what do you base your comment here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1598144/posts?page=62#62
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.