Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UAE Turns Back on Dollar in Foreign Reserves Shake-up
Telegraph.uk ^ | 3/14/2006 | Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

Posted on 03/18/2006 4:01:21 AM PST by ex-Texan

The United Arab Emirates is planning to switch 10pc of its foreign reserves from dollars to euros in the first sign of fall-out from Washington's snub to Dubai Ports World last week.

Sultan bin Nasser Al Suwaidi, the governor of UAE's central bank, said the plan was designed to achieve a better balance in the $19.1bn reserves of the oil-rich Gulf federation, almost entirely held in dollars.

"This policy initiative has nothing to do with the controversy over DP World's bid for P&O operations in the US," he said. In the same breath, however, he denounced the move by the US Congress to block the Dubai group from taking control of six American ports on security grounds, warning it would drive capital away.

"It is against the principles of international trade. People will look at investment opportunities in the US through new binoculars," he said.

The UAE has been a close ally of Washington in the fight against terrorism, so the shrill tone on Capitol Hill - bordering on anti-Arab hysteria - has been deeply wounding. There are fears it could lead to a withdrawal of petrodollar funds from the US, much like the Saudi-driven capital flight after the terrorist attacks of 9/11.

"Dubai's difficulties are going to cause Arab countries to invest less in the United States," said Mohab Kamel, a trader at Kara Energy in Geneva. "The kick in the teeth by Washington is not reassuring for Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, which have a more fundamentalist attitude," he said.

The next move could be a decision by Emirates Airlines - the region's top carrier - to opt for Europe's Airbus A350 in a $7.5bn order for passenger jets expected next month instead of Boeing's 787 Dreamliner.

The IMF forecasts that the Gulf region will rack up a current account surplus of $275bn in 2006, giving it huge clout in the global capital markets.

By some estimates, the recycling of petrodollars has eclipsed the Asian central banks as the chief source of foreign financing for the US deficit, now over 7pc of GDP. Exact figures are elusive as Middle East holdings of US Treasury bonds are mostly disguised through purchases in London and the Caribbean.

David Lubin, an economist at HSBC and author of a report on Gulf petrodollars, said Washington could prove to be the victim of its recourse to "asset protectionism".

"It has been a particularly unpleasant incident and it may well have longer-term consequences since the US relies on foreign inflows to fund its current account deficit. This sort of move will make it even more dependent on easily-reversible portfolio flows," he said.

The IMF's Middle East director, Mohsin Khan, said that central banks in the Gulf region play a secondary role in recycling petrodollars.

What really matters is the investment strategy of the giant oil funds, such as the secretive Abu Dhabi Investment Trust now worth well over $200bn.

"They are still going into US-denominated assets, and the proportion of the assets held in dollars is not changing much - Gulf investors are not dumping dollars," he told the Middle East Economic Digest.

The moment they do, however, the long-awaited slide in the US dollar could start with a vengeance.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: congressmorons; dollar; dubai; soreloserism; uae; usd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-147 next last
"What really matters is the investment strategy of the giant oil funds, such as the secretive Abu Dhabi Investment Trust now worth well over $200bn.

"They are still going into US-denominated assets, and the proportion of the assets held in dollars is not changing much - Gulf investors are not dumping dollars" . . . The moment they do, however, the long-awaited slide in the US dollar could start with a vengeance.

Let me see if I understand the full implications of UAE's economic policy: They are shifting 10% of their foreign reserves into Euros immediately. Iran is starting its oil bourse officially next week. The UAE is right next door to Iran. OPEC controls most of the oil money in the region. Abu Dhabi controls $ 200 billion worth of investments that are currently held in USD. Right now, Gulf investors are not dumping dollars for Euros.

If the U.S. dollar falls against the Euro it is a good thing for America, right? That means people will be buying more of our goods, right? Of course, Americans do not buy goods made here in the U.S. anymore. Because we are addicted to cheap foreign made goods as sold by companies like Wally World. What do we actually manufacture here in the U.S. today? Er, uh, televisions? Tires? Gasoline? More American companies have been sold to foreign corporate owners during the past six years than ever before. But my government is looking out for me.

Oh, dear me, is there something going on here that I do not understand? Sounds a bit like the early stages of a global trade war to me. [Learn more?] Anyway, I'm just a geezer.

1 posted on 03/18/2006 4:01:28 AM PST by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
I don't know enough to be able to help you. Perhaps some kind FReeper versed in economics could weight in?

carolyn

2 posted on 03/18/2006 4:04:44 AM PST by CDHart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

I recall a last year Warren Buffett shorted the dollar for the euro. He lost $1 billion.


3 posted on 03/18/2006 4:13:14 AM PST by TXBSAFH (Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH

Yes, Buffet lost $1 billion, but that was right on the heels of his shorting the dollar and making $3 billion.

So, he is still $2 billion ahead.


4 posted on 03/18/2006 4:18:22 AM PST by patriciaruth (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1562436/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan; butternut_squash_bisque

What really matters is the investment strategy of the giant oil funds, such as the secretive Abu Dhabi Investment Trust now worth well over $200bn.



maybe they realize there is an end in sight for oil (their sole income) as we have used it over the last century, and are getting nervous


5 posted on 03/18/2006 4:19:32 AM PST by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

Well I would guess people had better get a bike or a horse which ever one they have room for...LOL!


6 posted on 03/18/2006 4:20:40 AM PST by Beth528
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

Yes. this is the opening salvo. Just waiting to see if Congress actually understands the implications of a truly global market driven economy with "REAL" free trade. This port deal indicates to me that congress/politicians (yet again) speak with forked-tongues.


7 posted on 03/18/2006 4:26:35 AM PST by roaddog727 (P=3/8 A. or, P=plenty...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CDHart

Good idea! Kudos, Carolyn. There is so much disinformation out there. My b.s. meter goes into the danger zone every time I turn on the tube. Can you believe that Katy Couric is gonna be on CBS News? Guess we can all look forward to in depth interviews with Tom Cruise this year, huh?


8 posted on 03/18/2006 4:28:23 AM PST by ex-Texan (Matthew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

The UAE is interested in making money.

They'll do what makes them the most money regardless of the petty politics going on.


9 posted on 03/18/2006 4:29:00 AM PST by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
As of September 2002 the just the Saudi's had 400- 600 billion dollars invested in the United States.

Pay backs are gonna be hell.






10 posted on 03/18/2006 4:29:21 AM PST by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
What happens is that oil producing countries want to diversify their currency holdings. By doing that they are weakening the US and they are getting stronger themselves. Also the large trade deficits and budget deficits are alarming to other more US friendly countries.
Every citizen in the world that has any contact with reality can see that the US is balancing on the edge. So I guess everybody is positioning themselves for a possible big rush to the bank.
The US is still floating on its previous economic strenght and technological advantage from WWII. This means that many countries have been trading in dollars and have or had great trust in the dollar.
This situation has resemblance to brand trust. The brand stays on top some time after it actually has lost its advantage. More and more people finds out that this brand isnt good anymore and they flee it.
That is what we are seeing more and more signs of today. The US should stop borrowing money and correct its economy. The later this correction comes the harder the fall. It will probably be a hard fall today too, but at least then people will get the right message. This will make people more creative.
11 posted on 03/18/2006 4:36:43 AM PST by tomjohn77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
From petro-dollars to petro-euros ... Can petro-yuan be far behind?
12 posted on 03/18/2006 4:38:18 AM PST by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomjohn77
That WWII "technological" annuity is now negative ... in large part due to a US taxpayer-funded dyfunctional public education system.
13 posted on 03/18/2006 4:41:36 AM PST by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tomjohn77

Interesting interpretation from Norway, my FR friend. Kudos to you as well.


14 posted on 03/18/2006 4:45:06 AM PST by ex-Texan (Matthew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
If the U.S. dollar falls against the Euro it is a good thing for America, right? That means people will be buying more of our goods, right?

Keep in mind that the free traitors love cheap labor, since they perceive that one factor as the key to their God, "Lower Prices To Consumers". A declining dollar means that real wages (as opposed to nominal, unadjusted wage numbers) will decline in comparison to the rest of the world.

Of course, this means that the American middle class will be hurt, and badly. It may mean a certain amount of social upheaval, possibly including an H. Clinton Presidency in 2008.

But, what does that matter? Wages will have been forced lower.

Had we been wiser, and protected our domestic producers, we would not suffer what is surely to come. But the free traitors were at work, burrowing at the foundations of our economy, until we produce nothing. We'll pay a price. But better now than later, when it would be still worse.

15 posted on 03/18/2006 4:48:15 AM PST by neutrino (Globalization is the economic treason that dare not speak its name.(173))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

I like economy. I studied economy in the US and have many good American friends that I still keep in touch with. My best friend from the college days is a good republican.


16 posted on 03/18/2006 4:49:00 AM PST by tomjohn77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: neutrino
"means that real wages (as opposed to nominal, unadjusted wage numbers) will decline in comparison to the rest of the world. "
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>..........
for my 2 cents: the idea of allowing markets to produce anywhere in the world were labor is cheap is the one golden rule by free traders
(the truth is globalist by definition and by intent want a weaker USA.)
when they move production to lowest cost areas..you are affecting the higher cost area (wages)..so continued free trade is removing buying power from the higher cost producer - for a co they end up going out of business-but for the workers? their standard of living must also at some point meet the mean of the low cost areas (third world)
What we end up with is lower and lower standards of living
in the West as we approach the levels of the third world.
Free trade has much too high a cost and is not "FREE" When will Americans wake up to this fact-probly never as we have almost all big name money experts(even our talk guru RUSH) extolling the love for free trade- IF EU and china have free trade I would like to see the proof.
17 posted on 03/18/2006 5:03:45 AM PST by ConsentofGoverned (if a sucker is born every minute, what are the voters?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green; AAABEST; afraidfortherepublic; A. Pole; arete; beaver fever; billbears; Digger

*PING* !


18 posted on 03/18/2006 5:07:29 AM PST by ex-Texan (Matthew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
The UAE has been a close ally of Washington in the fight against terrorism, so the shrill tone on Capitol Hill - bordering on anti-Arab hysteria - has been deeply wounding.

The "shrill tone" from Capitol Hill was only an echo of anti-Arab concern (not "hysteria") from the vast majority of Americans - and is well deserved.

UAE has been an ally ... but ONLY recently and ONLY in the WOT and the war in Iraq. They may be an "ally", only for now. They were not just a few years ago and they may not be tomorrow.

UAE and all of Islam are not an ally in defense of our ideals and values of freedom, liberty, democracy and religious tolerance.

Boo hoo hoo.

My heart bleeds for UAE.

19 posted on 03/18/2006 5:22:18 AM PST by manwiththehands (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

I think the conventional wisdom is that if people don't want to be holding as many dollars or things that are more or less equivalent to dollars, such as Treasury Bonds, then there will be less demand for them; bond prices go down and interest rates go up.

If our government could make an honest and balanced budget then this wouldn't be as much of an issue.


20 posted on 03/18/2006 6:26:12 AM PST by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy
"If our government could make an honest and balanced budget then this wouldn't be as much of an issue."

We definitely have a winner for the best comment on this thread.

21 posted on 03/18/2006 6:40:46 AM PST by trek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
The United Arab Emirates is planning to switch 10pc of its foreign reserves from dollars to euros in the first sign of fall-out from Washington's snub to Dubai Ports World last week.

Well we just better invade them for 'regime change'. Instead of allowing the market and free trade to work, we have a reawakening of the mercantilist Amurica Firsters egged on by anti-Arabic sentiment. It will get much worse in the years to come. Thanks guys!!

22 posted on 03/18/2006 6:53:19 AM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

Most Congress people are stupid, ignorant and incompetent. To expect wise decisions and intelligent programs is an OXYMORON.


23 posted on 03/18/2006 7:07:41 AM PST by mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: manwiththehands

Nations have no permanent friends or allies. They only have permanent interests.


Lord Palmerston, the 19th century British prime minister,


24 posted on 03/18/2006 7:24:28 AM PST by DUMBGRUNT (islam is a mutant meme)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

I'll read "learn more" later.

IIRC, OPEC has been threatening us for years regarding the price of oil. Now they are happy that they have the excuse to raise the price and punish the US. Even Clinton had to beg OPEC to keep the price down. Prior to the Iraq war, OPEC again threatened to use the Euro and many people thought the Euro was the real reason for the war.


25 posted on 03/18/2006 7:45:30 AM PST by texastoo ("trash the treaties")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH

Start to worry. This is only the begining of the dollar collapse. I hope you all have some gold!


26 posted on 03/18/2006 8:06:29 AM PST by jeffs47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neutrino

Lower dollar helps us sell more stuff overseas.


27 posted on 03/18/2006 8:10:15 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jamaksin

Just because we have a dyfunctional public education system, that is no reason to prevent a depression. Or is it? We can't leave a Child Behind, can we?


28 posted on 03/18/2006 8:12:26 AM PST by B4Ranch (The truth is good for you, like sunlight, but too much all at once can really hurt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy
My grandfather was a second generation immigrant from Italy who started a business with his four brothers in the 1940s.They opened a machine shop that employed fifteen people who made specialty hinges and other products for a variety of industries.When I think about his business I don't think he would have been successful if he had to deal with the trade policies we have today.I drove past his factory a few years ago and it was vacant along with ten other buildings that once housed machine shops.It bothered me to see those buildings vacant.
29 posted on 03/18/2006 8:16:17 AM PST by rdcorso (There Is No Such Thing As A Neutral Person During A War With Radical Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
The UAE has been a close ally of Washington in the fight against terrorism, so the shrill tone on Capitol Hill - bordering on anti-Arab hysteria - has been deeply wounding.

The GOP Congress, led by the excreble Peter King, distinguished itself for its cowardice over the last two weeks.

Losing control of both houses in November would be a fitting reward.

30 posted on 03/18/2006 8:16:57 AM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

Good, the deficit is out of control.


31 posted on 03/18/2006 8:17:49 AM PST by John Lenin (The Soviet Collapse=The Left's Humpty Dumpty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
What do we actually manufacture here in the U.S. today?

Nothing. If you call $3 trillion nothing.

Anyway, I'm just a geezer.

You're an economically illiterate geezer.

32 posted on 03/18/2006 8:38:17 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
The GOP Congress, led by the excreble Peter King, distinguished itself for its cowardice over the last two weeks.
The real issue is how we relinquished our money and therefore power to a pip-squeak nation no bigger than a state and now you clowns are cowering in fear of them.

United States a super power? HA! Thanks to phoney free trade policies that's a sick joke.

33 posted on 03/18/2006 8:40:38 AM PST by lewislynn (Fairtax = lies, hope, wishful thinking, conjecture and lies. (no it's not a mistake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: neutrino
A declining dollar means that real wages (as opposed to nominal, unadjusted wage numbers) will decline in comparison to the rest of the world.

Of course, this means that the American middle class will be hurt, and badly.

The only people who'll be hurt are those who buy foreign goods. And you want to hurt them, don't you? This should make you happy.

34 posted on 03/18/2006 8:42:38 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot; ex-Texan
Can you believe it? Instead of actually trying to find out what we manufacture in the U.S., folks come to FR and broadcast their ignorance. I've never really understood it . . . what motivates someone to actually beg for one of those Jeff Foxworthy "stupid signs?"
35 posted on 03/18/2006 8:46:26 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
"Oh, dear me, is there something going on here that I do not understand? Sounds a bit like the early stages of a global trade war to me."

Wait till monday - The Iranian Oil Bourse is scheduled to begin operation. Oil purchases in euros rather than dollars = the other shoe dropping!

Hunker down and hold on to your assets kids!

36 posted on 03/18/2006 8:51:23 AM PST by patriot_wes (papal infallibility - a proud tradition since 1869)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
The real issue is how we relinquished our money

We didn't relinquish our money, we spent it. Would you prefer we bought no foreign oil? Gas would only go up to about $10 a gallon. But at least we wouldn't relinquish any power to the UAE. LOL!

37 posted on 03/18/2006 8:58:34 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jeffs47

If the dollar collapses then welcome to the global depression.


38 posted on 03/18/2006 9:00:14 AM PST by TXBSAFH (Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH

So let me see if I have this straight . . . China spends billions of dollars a year keeping its currency at an artificially low level, but if we allow the dollar to fall (and thus bringing the dollar-renminbi level to more realistic level, as well as costing the Chinese more money as a bonus), it's world depression time?


39 posted on 03/18/2006 9:24:47 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot; 1rudeboy
The only people who'll be hurt are those who buy foreign goods. And you want to hurt them, don't you? This should make you happy.

It pleases me on several levels - as 1rudeboy points out, the decline of the dollar should increase U.S. exports. And as you, Toddsterpatriot, mention, it will hurt those who purchase foreign goods. That brings an oscillation of cold glee to my core. And, too, this move helps my investments.

But whatever else you believe about me, I want America and Americans to prosper. In the short term, this will be painful to many. I hope it will cause people to turn their back on free traitin' - for, if they do not, the next cycle will bring even greater pain.

40 posted on 03/18/2006 10:31:05 AM PST by neutrino (Globalization is the economic treason that dare not speak its name.(173))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason

Yep.


41 posted on 03/18/2006 10:32:56 AM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
"It is against the principles of international trade. People will look at investment opportunities in the US through new binoculars," he said.

Uhhuh! Sure they will.

42 posted on 03/18/2006 10:34:31 AM PST by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neutrino; 1rudeboy; Mase; expat_panama; Petronski
It pleases me on several levels - as 1rudeboy points out, the decline of the dollar should increase U.S. exports.

And you believe exports are good and imports are bad. You also believe that trade deficits are bad while trade surpluses are good.

And as you, Toddsterpatriot, mention, it will hurt those who purchase foreign goods. That brings an oscillation of cold glee to my core.

Yes, all those Americans who insist on driving their cars and buying all that foreign oil. Stick it to those bastards.

And, too, this move helps my investments.

Interesting, you want Americans to be hurt so that you can personally benefit. I thought only free traiters were that greedy.

43 posted on 03/18/2006 10:38:03 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: jeffs47
Start to worry. This is only the begining of the dollar collapse. I hope you all have some gold!

I'm not gonna worry until there's a reason to worry. I've heard for 30 years now about all these economic horrors, how we'd run out of oil by the mid-80s, how the earth couldn't last past the year 2000 due to "global warming," how houses were going to be selling for peanuts...

Y-A-W-N!!!

When there's a reason to worry, then we'll worry. There's little to do about it 'til then.

As well, if the US economy collapses, it ain't gonna do the world economy any favors. So any nations thinking that they're gonna bring down the US in this way are committing a degree of suicide themselves.

44 posted on 03/18/2006 10:38:36 AM PST by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ConsentofGoverned
...but for the workers? their standard of living must also at some point meet the mean of the low cost areas (third world) What we end up with is lower and lower standards of living in the West as we approach the levels of the third world.

I want to thank you for having a clear understanding what the long term effect of free trade is.
45 posted on 03/18/2006 10:46:12 AM PST by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.org - Forging a Rebirth of Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil
"I want to thank you for having a clear understanding what the long term effect of free trade is."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>..............
It is hard to come to that understanding when being constantly told by "experts" that Free Trade is great for America. Those that most prize numbers and data always support this view..but none look behind the numbers..the graph of GDP printed on this thread is a great example.
Looks like we have no problem with incr GDP. but if we add the population incr, inflation, and deduct the service industry output over this time period- the graph of manufactured GDP does not look quite so rosy.
I believe the Free traders and Globalists are not evil.
They think this is best. For reasons of world peace, or economic free system zeal. If they were more honest with us they would tell us yes the reduction in living standards is a risk, but they must hope that as third world living standards are raised that they will approach those seen in America and the fall to the mean will not be so severe.
I think it is blackmail, on the back of the American worker, Co's and taxpayers. And I do not see the raising of world living standards happening if for no other reason then the fact the world cannot support that economic growth - or else we better find another 60 million barrels a day in oil production somewhere (as an example)
46 posted on 03/18/2006 11:07:31 AM PST by ConsentofGoverned (if a sucker is born every minute, what are the voters?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

That will be a mistake .. they'll lose money in the long run


47 posted on 03/18/2006 11:08:43 AM PST by Mo1 ("Stupidity is also a gift from God, but it should not be abused." Pope John Paul II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

UAE going after our economy reads like a bin laden wet dream...he failed with the WTC and now his pals are trying another angle.

They will fail big time and they will loose big money if they continue to pursue our destruction.


48 posted on 03/18/2006 11:17:00 AM PST by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConsentofGoverned
Looks like we have no problem with incr GDP. but if we add the population incr, inflation, and deduct the service industry output over this time period- the graph of manufactured GDP does not look quite so rosy.

The graph of GDP (post #34) is only manufactured goods. You were saying it didn't look so rosy?

49 posted on 03/18/2006 11:27:36 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot; 1rudeboy
Interesting, you want Americans to be hurt so that you can personally benefit. I thought only free traiters were that greedy.

Sly debating at its finest!

No - I want Americans to put up sufficient trade barriers, both tariff and non-tariff regulations that domestic industry will be protected. This will cause short term pain with a substantial long-term benefit.

That said, it will take some time before the lesson is learned. I intend to profit from it. I will gleefully rub the free traitors' noses in that fact in order to cause greater emotional distress - but it's for their own good, so they'll remember the evil of free traitin'. After the lesson has been well and truly learned, I'll invest in the future growth of America - which I'd rather be doing anyway.

And you mention oil - please note that we have made our enemies rich. Had we inconvenienced ourselves a bit, we would have been better off and our enemies would be far poorer. Iran would not be a dangerous enemy - instead, they would be too busy trying to eke out a pathetic living.

50 posted on 03/18/2006 12:18:22 PM PST by neutrino (Globalization is the economic treason that dare not speak its name.(173))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson