Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UAE Turns Back on Dollar in Foreign Reserves Shake-up
Telegraph.uk ^ | 3/14/2006 | Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

Posted on 3/18/2006, 12:01:21 PM by ex-Texan

The United Arab Emirates is planning to switch 10pc of its foreign reserves from dollars to euros in the first sign of fall-out from Washington's snub to Dubai Ports World last week.

Sultan bin Nasser Al Suwaidi, the governor of UAE's central bank, said the plan was designed to achieve a better balance in the $19.1bn reserves of the oil-rich Gulf federation, almost entirely held in dollars.

"This policy initiative has nothing to do with the controversy over DP World's bid for P&O operations in the US," he said. In the same breath, however, he denounced the move by the US Congress to block the Dubai group from taking control of six American ports on security grounds, warning it would drive capital away.

"It is against the principles of international trade. People will look at investment opportunities in the US through new binoculars," he said.

The UAE has been a close ally of Washington in the fight against terrorism, so the shrill tone on Capitol Hill - bordering on anti-Arab hysteria - has been deeply wounding. There are fears it could lead to a withdrawal of petrodollar funds from the US, much like the Saudi-driven capital flight after the terrorist attacks of 9/11.

"Dubai's difficulties are going to cause Arab countries to invest less in the United States," said Mohab Kamel, a trader at Kara Energy in Geneva. "The kick in the teeth by Washington is not reassuring for Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, which have a more fundamentalist attitude," he said.

The next move could be a decision by Emirates Airlines - the region's top carrier - to opt for Europe's Airbus A350 in a $7.5bn order for passenger jets expected next month instead of Boeing's 787 Dreamliner.

The IMF forecasts that the Gulf region will rack up a current account surplus of $275bn in 2006, giving it huge clout in the global capital markets.

By some estimates, the recycling of petrodollars has eclipsed the Asian central banks as the chief source of foreign financing for the US deficit, now over 7pc of GDP. Exact figures are elusive as Middle East holdings of US Treasury bonds are mostly disguised through purchases in London and the Caribbean.

David Lubin, an economist at HSBC and author of a report on Gulf petrodollars, said Washington could prove to be the victim of its recourse to "asset protectionism".

"It has been a particularly unpleasant incident and it may well have longer-term consequences since the US relies on foreign inflows to fund its current account deficit. This sort of move will make it even more dependent on easily-reversible portfolio flows," he said.

The IMF's Middle East director, Mohsin Khan, said that central banks in the Gulf region play a secondary role in recycling petrodollars.

What really matters is the investment strategy of the giant oil funds, such as the secretive Abu Dhabi Investment Trust now worth well over $200bn.

"They are still going into US-denominated assets, and the proportion of the assets held in dollars is not changing much - Gulf investors are not dumping dollars," he told the Middle East Economic Digest.

The moment they do, however, the long-awaited slide in the US dollar could start with a vengeance.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: congressmorons; dollar; dubai; soreloserism; uae; usd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last
"What really matters is the investment strategy of the giant oil funds, such as the secretive Abu Dhabi Investment Trust now worth well over $200bn.

"They are still going into US-denominated assets, and the proportion of the assets held in dollars is not changing much - Gulf investors are not dumping dollars" . . . The moment they do, however, the long-awaited slide in the US dollar could start with a vengeance.

Let me see if I understand the full implications of UAE's economic policy: They are shifting 10% of their foreign reserves into Euros immediately. Iran is starting its oil bourse officially next week. The UAE is right next door to Iran. OPEC controls most of the oil money in the region. Abu Dhabi controls $ 200 billion worth of investments that are currently held in USD. Right now, Gulf investors are not dumping dollars for Euros.

If the U.S. dollar falls against the Euro it is a good thing for America, right? That means people will be buying more of our goods, right? Of course, Americans do not buy goods made here in the U.S. anymore. Because we are addicted to cheap foreign made goods as sold by companies like Wally World. What do we actually manufacture here in the U.S. today? Er, uh, televisions? Tires? Gasoline? More American companies have been sold to foreign corporate owners during the past six years than ever before. But my government is looking out for me.

Oh, dear me, is there something going on here that I do not understand? Sounds a bit like the early stages of a global trade war to me. [Learn more?] Anyway, I'm just a geezer.

1 posted on 3/18/2006, 12:01:28 PM by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
I don't know enough to be able to help you. Perhaps some kind FReeper versed in economics could weight in?

carolyn

2 posted on 3/18/2006, 12:04:44 PM by CDHart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

I recall a last year Warren Buffett shorted the dollar for the euro. He lost $1 billion.


3 posted on 3/18/2006, 12:13:14 PM by TXBSAFH (Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH

Yes, Buffet lost $1 billion, but that was right on the heels of his shorting the dollar and making $3 billion.

So, he is still $2 billion ahead.


4 posted on 3/18/2006, 12:18:22 PM by patriciaruth (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1562436/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan; butternut_squash_bisque

What really matters is the investment strategy of the giant oil funds, such as the secretive Abu Dhabi Investment Trust now worth well over $200bn.



maybe they realize there is an end in sight for oil (their sole income) as we have used it over the last century, and are getting nervous


5 posted on 3/18/2006, 12:19:32 PM by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

Well I would guess people had better get a bike or a horse which ever one they have room for...LOL!


6 posted on 3/18/2006, 12:20:40 PM by Beth528
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

Yes. this is the opening salvo. Just waiting to see if Congress actually understands the implications of a truly global market driven economy with "REAL" free trade. This port deal indicates to me that congress/politicians (yet again) speak with forked-tongues.


7 posted on 3/18/2006, 12:26:35 PM by roaddog727 (P=3/8 A. or, P=plenty...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CDHart

Good idea! Kudos, Carolyn. There is so much disinformation out there. My b.s. meter goes into the danger zone every time I turn on the tube. Can you believe that Katy Couric is gonna be on CBS News? Guess we can all look forward to in depth interviews with Tom Cruise this year, huh?


8 posted on 3/18/2006, 12:28:23 PM by ex-Texan (Matthew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

The UAE is interested in making money.

They'll do what makes them the most money regardless of the petty politics going on.


9 posted on 3/18/2006, 12:29:00 PM by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
As of September 2002 the just the Saudi's had 400- 600 billion dollars invested in the United States.

Pay backs are gonna be hell.






10 posted on 3/18/2006, 12:29:21 PM by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
What happens is that oil producing countries want to diversify their currency holdings. By doing that they are weakening the US and they are getting stronger themselves. Also the large trade deficits and budget deficits are alarming to other more US friendly countries.
Every citizen in the world that has any contact with reality can see that the US is balancing on the edge. So I guess everybody is positioning themselves for a possible big rush to the bank.
The US is still floating on its previous economic strenght and technological advantage from WWII. This means that many countries have been trading in dollars and have or had great trust in the dollar.
This situation has resemblance to brand trust. The brand stays on top some time after it actually has lost its advantage. More and more people finds out that this brand isnt good anymore and they flee it.
That is what we are seeing more and more signs of today. The US should stop borrowing money and correct its economy. The later this correction comes the harder the fall. It will probably be a hard fall today too, but at least then people will get the right message. This will make people more creative.
11 posted on 3/18/2006, 12:36:43 PM by tomjohn77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
From petro-dollars to petro-euros ... Can petro-yuan be far behind?
12 posted on 3/18/2006, 12:38:18 PM by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomjohn77
That WWII "technological" annuity is now negative ... in large part due to a US taxpayer-funded dyfunctional public education system.
13 posted on 3/18/2006, 12:41:36 PM by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tomjohn77

Interesting interpretation from Norway, my FR friend. Kudos to you as well.


14 posted on 3/18/2006, 12:45:06 PM by ex-Texan (Matthew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
If the U.S. dollar falls against the Euro it is a good thing for America, right? That means people will be buying more of our goods, right?

Keep in mind that the free traitors love cheap labor, since they perceive that one factor as the key to their God, "Lower Prices To Consumers". A declining dollar means that real wages (as opposed to nominal, unadjusted wage numbers) will decline in comparison to the rest of the world.

Of course, this means that the American middle class will be hurt, and badly. It may mean a certain amount of social upheaval, possibly including an H. Clinton Presidency in 2008.

But, what does that matter? Wages will have been forced lower.

Had we been wiser, and protected our domestic producers, we would not suffer what is surely to come. But the free traitors were at work, burrowing at the foundations of our economy, until we produce nothing. We'll pay a price. But better now than later, when it would be still worse.

15 posted on 3/18/2006, 12:48:15 PM by neutrino (Globalization is the economic treason that dare not speak its name.(173))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

I like economy. I studied economy in the US and have many good American friends that I still keep in touch with. My best friend from the college days is a good republican.


16 posted on 3/18/2006, 12:49:00 PM by tomjohn77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: neutrino
"means that real wages (as opposed to nominal, unadjusted wage numbers) will decline in comparison to the rest of the world. "
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>..........
for my 2 cents: the idea of allowing markets to produce anywhere in the world were labor is cheap is the one golden rule by free traders
(the truth is globalist by definition and by intent want a weaker USA.)
when they move production to lowest cost areas..you are affecting the higher cost area (wages)..so continued free trade is removing buying power from the higher cost producer - for a co they end up going out of business-but for the workers? their standard of living must also at some point meet the mean of the low cost areas (third world)
What we end up with is lower and lower standards of living
in the West as we approach the levels of the third world.
Free trade has much too high a cost and is not "FREE" When will Americans wake up to this fact-probly never as we have almost all big name money experts(even our talk guru RUSH) extolling the love for free trade- IF EU and china have free trade I would like to see the proof.
17 posted on 3/18/2006, 1:03:45 PM by ConsentofGoverned (if a sucker is born every minute, what are the voters?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green; AAABEST; afraidfortherepublic; A. Pole; arete; beaver fever; billbears; Digger

*PING* !


18 posted on 3/18/2006, 1:07:29 PM by ex-Texan (Matthew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
The UAE has been a close ally of Washington in the fight against terrorism, so the shrill tone on Capitol Hill - bordering on anti-Arab hysteria - has been deeply wounding.

The "shrill tone" from Capitol Hill was only an echo of anti-Arab concern (not "hysteria") from the vast majority of Americans - and is well deserved.

UAE has been an ally ... but ONLY recently and ONLY in the WOT and the war in Iraq. They may be an "ally", only for now. They were not just a few years ago and they may not be tomorrow.

UAE and all of Islam are not an ally in defense of our ideals and values of freedom, liberty, democracy and religious tolerance.

Boo hoo hoo.

My heart bleeds for UAE.

19 posted on 3/18/2006, 1:22:18 PM by manwiththehands (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

I think the conventional wisdom is that if people don't want to be holding as many dollars or things that are more or less equivalent to dollars, such as Treasury Bonds, then there will be less demand for them; bond prices go down and interest rates go up.

If our government could make an honest and balanced budget then this wouldn't be as much of an issue.


20 posted on 3/18/2006, 2:26:12 PM by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson