Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NC Wants Smith & Wesson to Replace Faulty Revolvers
News & Observer ^ | 03/18/06 | Associated Press

Posted on 03/19/2006 8:10:48 AM PST by Copernicus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-174 last
To: Spktyr

I am a believer in head shots.


161 posted on 03/20/2006 8:01:20 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

Even a .45 head shot might not stop someone. There are at least two documented cases where the slug was deflected by a forehead or cheekbone.


162 posted on 03/20/2006 8:20:01 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

I'll take my chances. Cases of bone deflecting a .45 slug are very rare. If it deflects a .45, what chance does a 9mm have?


163 posted on 03/20/2006 9:21:12 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

More, if the 9mm has more rounds - certainly a lot more than just 6 rounds of .38.

My point is that you cannot rely on one-shot-stops with a handgun.


164 posted on 03/20/2006 9:41:33 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
"Looks like a possible metallurgical problem to me."

Possibly.

Looks to me like a weak design.

Is that barrel made of 2 pieces, with an inner and outer sleeve? That looks inadequate for something that must contain pressures on the order of 20,000 to 30,000 psi.

Smiths have always looked flimsy to me. Probably a result of them trying to make them as light as possible.

165 posted on 03/20/2006 9:53:43 AM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nightdriver

This is pre 2-piece barrel design.


166 posted on 03/20/2006 10:19:44 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
Perhaps the officers are on a campaign of S&W destruction to convince management to replace the slow, antiquated wheel guns with modern Glocks?
Ha ha, could be. I used to hear the "they don't jam" argument in favor of revolvers, but when you read things like this it sort of makes that a moot point.
167 posted on 03/20/2006 5:37:04 PM PST by Scutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Copernicus

I have had S&W revolvers for years, but now my model 66 cylinder locked. It appears that the ejector rod unscrewed itself enough to do it. I will have to get a gunsmith to look at it.


168 posted on 10/24/2006 6:02:36 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

That's not a new problem; I don't think it applies to either older or new S&W but I remember a period (late 70's/early 80's?) when it was common, along with really rancid cylinder to forcing cone gap and alignment.


169 posted on 10/24/2006 6:23:01 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: norton

My mdl 66 is over 30 years old.


170 posted on 10/24/2006 3:54:30 PM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
Although I still check the rod:
My S&W .22, .38 & .44 work just fine.
I've scrapped S&Ws for finish and for the reasons cited previously.

They've gone through a couple (!) of policy/quality changes in the past few years.

At least Colt stayed relatively consistent in the arrogance challenge.

(NOTE: 'arrogance' does not imply justification.)

171 posted on 10/24/2006 6:04:32 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: norton

I dropped the mdl 66 off at the gunsmith. Apparently the bolt plunger spring and plunger got loose and when I removed the grips to take a look at the frame the parts must have dropped somewhere. Anyway the smithy said the parts are 30 bucks plus labor, about 70 bucks total. So it is not the extractor rod but the thumpiece that would not slide forward to release the cylinder.


172 posted on 10/25/2006 8:25:48 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
Oops!

But cheap is nice.

173 posted on 10/25/2006 9:29:36 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Get a copy of Kuhnhausen's S&W Shop Manual from Brownells, plus some gunsmithing screwdrivers and you'll be able to do most work under the sideplate yourself.


174 posted on 10/25/2006 9:31:48 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Dancing through life like a street mime with tourettes syndrome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-174 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson