I got to wondering about that with an open mind. How the heck could Fitz have gone looking for a leaker without first proving or finding there was an actionable leak?
But here's Tenet prodding the DoJ to "get on the case," the President saying "this is a serious leak," etc. - as well as what I think is the assumption that CIA won't forward a referral that it is IMPOSSIBLE to get a conviction on. I blame Fitz more for naivety than for flubbing the obvious. He made a mistake at the indictment announcement presser where he made the leak into a big deal. He should have focused on lying to investigators as a deal, and left it at that.
Fitz is still dogging Miller to cough up her sources and connections relating to the Holy Land Foundation case.
I want to see the whole Wilson conspiracy finally exposed. I still believe since he went to Niger to "investigate" information most likely gather via "HUMINT" his disclosures were illegal. When Val was "outed" the rats ran with it.
Almost like the Dems discussing censuring Bush about the NSA program when they illegally leaked Top Secret SCI.
David Barrett, has spent more than a decade and $21 million investigating Cisneros and he's still at it!
Ken Starr spent $47 million investigating the Clintons and Lawrence Walsh spent $48 million investigating the Reagan administration!!!
Fraud against the American people by accepting money (salaries) for continuing to investigate a non-crime?