[Real Cynic No More]

I think Fitzgerald may be guilty of prosecutorial misconduct. I believe Justice Dept guidelines say that the first step in such an investigation is determining whether any crime was committed. If there was no crime, there should have been no investigation. There appears to have been no crime, and Fitzgerald should have drawn that conclusion.

Fraud? Can we indict him and make him pay us back the money he's wasted? And triple that amount because he's been negligent?

[gogeo]

I don't see that happening, but I believe it would call the entire case into question. My hunch is that's why Fitz doesn't want to go there.