Little Suzie was skipping down the street. She came upon her grandma's cabin and entered. She then discovered that her grandma had been eaten by a wolf and became sick.
Using the same interpretive reasoning you use for Is. 53, Little Suzie was skipping because her grandma was killed by a wolf.
There's this little thing in writing called "timeline," you might want to look into it. There is NO reason to interpret the scriptures the way you have in Is. 53. Your view of Is. 53 is just that: your view. It is absolutely not the traditional one. It is your unreasonable, unnecessary interpretation invented for God know what your purpose is. Either you're stupid or you have an agenda. If the former, good enough. If the latter I can't imagine what. A pretty Jesus doesn't do good for anyone. The very reason God made Jesus look normal is so that people followed the truth of his message rather than his attractiveness. That's God--smart.
I can't see that you have any standing to be critical of any interpretations you don'tunderstand.
You've learned traditions, not truth. Adn you can see what Jesus thought of traditions vs truth...if you bother looking.
Here's one for you:
I'll bet you buy off on Peter denying Jesus three times. And, I'll agree. There were three. And three more.
Just for grins ('cuz I KNOW you've never done this) go to each gospel, list each denial with the who what where and when...then compare....and then if you say there were ONLY three denials you tell me which gospel accounts are wrong.
But I doubt you'll do this because you don't have the courage to actually look at something like this and face the facts.
You don't and you won't.