Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CowboyJay

You spoke of Arthur Anderson's "shareholders." Arthur Anderson did not have shareholders.


63 posted on 03/22/2006 9:45:26 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: 1rudeboy

"You spoke of Arthur Anderson's "shareholders." Arthur Anderson did not have shareholders."

My bad. Good catch. Doesn't really prove or disprove my premise either way. I personally don't believe corporatism is superior to the entrepreneurship/business-loan model on the basis of the basic laws of supply-and-demand. It succeeds only because it is given preferential treatment under the law.


67 posted on 03/22/2006 9:55:26 AM PST by CowboyJay (Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson