Posted on 03/23/2006 9:19:57 AM PST by NormsRevenge
They are all crooks.
LOL.. Thanks for reminding me of what some folks are willing to sacrifice to Just Win Baby!
There ya go with the word hate as some others like to toss out to detract from anything that doesn't protect the Gubby and his cohorts...
Nice, Thanks for the bump.
Still, you are first with ad hominems ... just like your lefty pals at LA Weekly. Your "newspaper of record" Blech!
Refute its content, Please. instead of trying to cover for those who could care less what, who or how they manipulate events and public mood to gain and retain power..
You're the one posting tripe from the LA Weekly and trying to pass it off as "fact". Why stoop so low?
LOL.. How many New Majority folks are you representing or are you a member yourself?
Why not elevate your argument a bit and stop using words like hate and low?
Like I asked before, refute one item in the article. Please drop your tedious accusatory stance. It shows how little you have to offer substance wise for either side and makes you out to be nothing more than devoid of your own abilities to discern the state of politic in the state.
You seem to be supportive of the moderate approach to things, if ya get my drift.
Hate and low! Ha! You with your ad hominems. You're not so lofty. Live with it ... breathe it ... LA Weekly, the stuff of Liberal Dreams.
Excellent reply. Refuse to discuss content, excellent indeed. A true moderate in action. How like so many others who refuse to connect dots and just shrug and attack the poster and when unsuccessful attack the source but not the content.
I like how ya avoid answering any questions posed as well.
Refusr to own up to your ad hominem attacks. I know your love the bumps ... but no one is listening. Nor should they with your rock solid sources. Why cheapen yourself?
LOL.. Thanks for your concern about cheapening myself, I really feeel the love, man.
Like I said, you won't even attempt to refute any content, that speaks volumes in and of itself.
I felt the love too with your opening ad hominem. Yes, you avoid it. Nevertheless, the market opens early in California and I am way past bedtime. Go ... proceed with your liberal nuttiness. You do it so well.
The thread had pretty much died but since you came along ,, Thanks!
Republicans in Cali have moved into Dhimmi status.
What can ya say?
Our state and nation are suffering mightily as a result of a plethora of fools on both sides of the aisles these days, many of them masquerading as moderates in their own parties.
I don't consider corruption "tripe".
This makes me nauseous. Even if Arnold and his crew are buddy-buddy with Reiner and the Reineroids, the accusations of misuse of millions in taxpayer funds are serious and I have yet to see a solid refutation of them.
Even if Arnold doesn't want to be seen as bashing an "old friend" or whatever the heck it is, any such tail cannot be allowed to wag the dog. Do the right thing; people will respect you for it. "It is with regret that I must announce that I have replaced Mr. Reiner with ..." DO IT.
Saying, instead, that Reiner's "innocent until proven guilty" is avoiding the issue. It's a swell standard in courtroom criminal proceedings, but this IS NOT such a proceeding. Reiner has NO RIGHT to this job.
Jeeze. What a disappointment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.