Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army, Air Force Eye Upgraded Warthogs
InsideDefense.com | March 18, 2006 | Carlo Munoz

Posted on 03/23/2006 9:44:44 AM PST by 68skylark

The planned integration of an enhanced communications system into the venerable A-10 aircraft could pave the way for the platform’s introduction into a cutting-edge combat package being developed by the Air Force and Army, a senior program official says.

Plans to put the airborne Enhanced Position Locating Reporting System (ELPRS) onto a number of A-10s could allow the aircraft to be folded into the Joint Mission Capability Package (JMCP) concept, said Air National Guard Col. Louis Durkac, assistant director of requirements at Air Combat Command.

The concept is designed as a “capabilities-based force package composed of fielded [weapon] systems with interoperable information network equipment,” an air service official told Inside the Air Force last summer. The original concept formulated in late July 2005, would link a number of the Air Force F-16C+ fighter squadrons with an Army Stryker brigade combat team (SBCT), forming a single joint force package (ITAF, July 8, 2005, p1).

However, Durcak told ITAF in March that once sufficient numbers of the A-10 are fielded with the integral communications data link, connecting combat aircraft with their Stryker counterparts, the aircraft could result in a new Warthog-based JMCP spiral.

“We will be engaged with the A-10 operational test community from the beginning, but they will be busy with the modernization effort for the near term,” Durcak noted in a e-mail to ITAF.

Though an A-10 component is still years away, Durcak was adamant the Warthog’s addition into the JMCP program could serve as a template for the introduction of other platforms that might be fitted with the ELPRS system.

“You can even add ELPRS equipped armor to the mix, so you [could] potentially have an Abrahms, Bradley, Stryker, F-16C+ [and] A-10 JMCP,” Durcak wrote.

Last week, ITAF reported that JMCP coordinators were close to performing operational tests of the ELPRS on Army Stryker vehicles optimized for use by the service’s Tactical Air Control Party (TACP) units.

While modernization efforts on the A-10 have opened the door for eventually attaching the Warthog onto a JMCP team, motivation for the move was based on fiscal reality as much as innovation.

F-16C+ fleet reductions -- which will reduce aircraft numbers by as much as 40 percent -- as a result of decisions the Base Realignment and Closure Commission forced onto JMCP developers to seek alternative platforms to integrate into the fledgling air-ground combat package.

“BRAC it the F-16C+ fleet pretty hard,” Durkac said. “Luckily, the Air Force has widely chosen to outfit the A-10 with the same EPLRS data link radio that the F-16C+ and Stryker carry.”

“The [Pennsylvania] National Guard is to receive the Stryker in the next year,” Durkac wrote. “And the PA Air National Guard A-10’s would have been ideally situated to pair with them.”

Air Force budget officials requested $10.7 million to finance restoration efforts on retired A-10 aircraft, to replace those lost in combat as part of the Pentagon’s supplemental funding request for fiscal year 2006 (ITAF, Feb 24, p6).

Additionally, portions of the requested funding would pay for “30 aircraft-to-aircraft, aircraft-to-ground, ground-to-aircraft data links,” according to draft versions of the FY-06 supplemental.

However, the JMCP chief was quick to point out the possibilities of the A-10’s inclusion into the joint combat package program would not diminish the role of the F-16C+ role with the Stryker teams, adding the Falcon model has been fielded with the ELPRS system since 2000.

“We envision all possible combinations, based on the requirements of the situation. A JMCP with all three systems adds loiter time, air defense, a larger weapons load and more flexibility,” Durcak noted. “The A-10 adds more interoperability into the mix -- it’s not a replacement for the F-16C+.”

Durcak added the Warthog’s reputation as the standard bearer for air-to-ground support missions, made it a “natural fit” with the effort’s specialized Stryker units.

“The A-10 is the classic close air support platform, [it] can operate from unimproved airfields closer to the ground forces,” he said --“but there are fewer of them and they are not ready.”

The move to fold the A-10 into the JMCP program and possibly extend the teams’ overall capabilities in the field, was all part of the program’s overall focus.

“The JMCP is an operational laboratory,” Durcak wrote. “ It will demonstrate the capabilities available to joint forces commander of fully interoperable air and ground systems.”


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: a10; armsbuildup; army; cas; usaf; warthog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
I'm a big fan of the A-10 -- and any upgrades that get applied to this aircraft just make it better.
1 posted on 03/23/2006 9:44:46 AM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

'Hogs RULE!


2 posted on 03/23/2006 9:46:48 AM PST by null and void (Perhaps hating America is for those for whom hating Jews just isn't enough. - Philippe Roger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark; Dog; Coop; Cap Huff; Cannoneer No. 4

Now we are getting smart.


3 posted on 03/23/2006 9:47:18 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

good.
every few years, the Zoomies float the notion that the A10 ought to be retired. Glad to see this upgrade program.


4 posted on 03/23/2006 9:47:42 AM PST by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal. this would not be a problem if so many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

Save the HOGS!


5 posted on 03/23/2006 9:47:50 AM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
They also need to develop replacement wings for these flying tanks due to cracks being found on nearly all the Warthogs in service.
6 posted on 03/23/2006 9:47:59 AM PST by scooter2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

Are they at or near the max hours for airframe?


7 posted on 03/23/2006 9:48:39 AM PST by ElTianti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElTianti

If they are like the B-52, 50+ years in service, the airframes will just get rebuilt, over and over and over............................


8 posted on 03/23/2006 9:51:10 AM PST by lmailbvmbipfwedu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ElTianti

They might be. The article refers to them as "venerable."


9 posted on 03/23/2006 9:51:56 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
“And the PA Air National Guard A-10’s would have been ideally situated to pair with them.”

They fly right over my house pretty regular. I've had them low enough that I can see a helmet in the cockpit. I can hear 'em coming and always get outside to look and wave. Makes me as excited as a little boy again every single time!!

10 posted on 03/23/2006 9:52:47 AM PST by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

I don't know if it's a good comparison but I've always thought the Warthog is to modern days what the Thunderbolt was to WWII, a real work horse.


11 posted on 03/23/2006 9:53:37 AM PST by jazusamo (Excuse me Helen, I'm answering your first accusation. - President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
... every few years, the Zoomies float the notion that the A10 ought to be retired.

They came close to accomplishing that back in the late 1980's. Then Gulf War I came along and the A-10 went from orphan to the hottest aircraft in the Air Force.

12 posted on 03/23/2006 9:54:00 AM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
I don't know if it's a good comparison but I've always thought the Warthog is to modern days what the Thunderbolt was to WWII, a real work horse.

I think that's an excellent comparison.

13 posted on 03/23/2006 9:56:23 AM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: King Prout

It was supposed to be retired...


14 posted on 03/23/2006 9:58:47 AM PST by Youngman442002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

Where is the link to this article?


15 posted on 03/23/2006 9:59:55 AM PST by Wiz (Nightmare of the Information Warfare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Isn't Thunderbolt II the Warthogs' official name?


16 posted on 03/23/2006 10:02:00 AM PST by wolfpat (Dum vivimus, vivamus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Wiz
Where is the link to this article?

Sorry -- I don't know how I missed posting that link.

http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,91385,00.html?ESRC=army-a.nl

17 posted on 03/23/2006 10:02:53 AM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wolfpat

I don't know, I've never heard that but it could be.


18 posted on 03/23/2006 10:03:30 AM PST by jazusamo (Excuse me Helen, I'm answering your first accusation. - President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wolfpat
Isn't Thunderbolt II the Warthogs' official name?

Yes

19 posted on 03/23/2006 10:04:55 AM PST by COEXERJ145 (Real Leaders Base Their Decisions on Their Convictions. Wannabes Base Decisions on the Latest Poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wolfpat
I've been a fan of the Thunderbolt for years, built a couple of RC models and read quite a bit about them. WWII Ace Francis Gabreski flew it and shot down a lot of Germans. It could take a lot of punishment.
20 posted on 03/23/2006 10:08:44 AM PST by jazusamo (Excuse me Helen, I'm answering your first accusation. - President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson