Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Randy Quaid Sues Over 'Brokeback'
TMZ.com ^ | 3-23-06

Posted on 03/24/2006 4:46:03 AM PST by veronica

Actor claims producers defrauded him

(Mar. 23) -- Randy Quaid has filed a lawsuit claiming he was done in by producers of 'Brokeback Mountain.'

TMZ obtained a copy of the lawsuit, filed Thursday in Los Angeles Superior Court, claiming producers falsely represented the movie to him as \"a low-budget, art house film, with no prospect of making any money.\" Qauid claims the representations were a ruse from the beginning. 'Brokeback' has grossed around $160 million.

Quaid's suit claims that in 2004, he met with director Ang Lee, who offered him the role of Joe Aguirre. The suit alleges that Lee told Quaid: "We can't pay anything, we have very little money, everyone is making a sacrifice to make this film."

The suit does not specifically state how much Quaid made, but it does claim that the defendants "were engaged in a 'movie laundering' scheme designed to obtain the services of talent such as Randy Quaid on economically unfavorable art film terms..."

The suit asks for $10 million in damages as well as punitive damages. It also seeks "restitution for all ill-gotten gains."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: brokebackmountain; gollywoodpinglist; hollywoodpinglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: redlenses

Eddie: "Every time Catherine would turn on the microwave, I'd piss my pants and forget who I was for about half an hour. "


41 posted on 03/24/2006 6:56:12 AM PST by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

"Yeah, but daddy says I'm the best at it."


42 posted on 03/24/2006 6:58:32 AM PST by Richard Kimball (I like to make everyone's day a little more surreal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: veronica

This is interesting from a contractual point of view.

With studios trying to "launder" movies into appearing independent but in fact still owned by the studios. Thus you can make a "controversial" film without huring the suits.

This is a business issue which can ultimatly favor conservative themes. No longer will the left wingers of hollywood be able to tap into big budge resources to make agenda films like that homosexual porn film.


43 posted on 03/24/2006 7:14:54 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

"Bust a deal. Face the wheel!"

44 posted on 03/24/2006 7:25:16 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kewlhand`tek
He was in Midnight Express.

A great movie about hashish smuggler sent to a Turkish prison.

45 posted on 03/24/2006 7:31:48 AM PST by kaboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: veronica

Holy crap! Producers ripping off actors! I can't believe it! What has Hollywood come to?


46 posted on 03/24/2006 7:33:47 AM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

Oh...didn't know he appeared in Brokeback. Thanks.


47 posted on 03/24/2006 7:35:22 AM PST by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

Hey Randy, did you really think the producers of a leftist propaganda film would be really honorable and trustworthy people?

Simple solution: Don't appear in these kind of films.


48 posted on 03/24/2006 7:35:44 AM PST by puroresu (Conservatism is an observation; Liberalism is an ideology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NCLaw441
From what I see here I don't think he has much of a case. Fraud requires an intentional misrepresentation of a material fact.

Right, and the government can't take your property for private enterprise. < /sarcasm >

49 posted on 03/24/2006 7:42:35 AM PST by lewislynn (Fairtax = lies, hope, wishful thinking, conjecture and lies. (no it's not a mistake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: veronica
For the record, Quaid plays the local boss-man who refuses to rehire the two gay guys after discovering their relationship.

Thanks. It took me until your post to figure out if he was in the movie or not. The writer of the article is rather vague about it.

Randy Quaid is hardly a big enough star to complain that he was cheated out of big star money. I'm sure they paid him more than a "Randy Quaid" is worth.

He doesn't exactly put asses in the seats.

50 posted on 03/24/2006 7:47:48 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

And, oh yeah, I forgot the California factor. All bets are off.


51 posted on 03/24/2006 8:43:31 AM PST by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: redlenses

So that explains the blue leisure suit...


52 posted on 03/24/2006 8:45:02 AM PST by Clemenza (I Just Wasn't Made for These Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NCLaw441
I agree. It's only fraud if Lee knew at the time he made the representation that it was false. How could Quaid show Lee knew at that time that an extraordinarily adept future P.R. campaign would allow the movie to "buck" the odds and make some money?
53 posted on 03/24/2006 9:01:34 AM PST by colorado tanker (We need more "chicken-bleep Democrats" in the Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dead
Randy Quaid is hardly a big enough star to complain that he was cheated out of big star money. I'm sure they paid him more than a "Randy Quaid" is worth.

He doesn't exactly put asses in the seats.

To be fair, Randy Quaid is an actor who commanded a salary of $2.25 million ten years ago (according to imdb.com). For an established name, such as his, he'd likely expect to be paid in the same ballpark today.

You often enough see actors taking chump change for a "small film" because they believed the project artistically worthy. Seems as though Randy Quaid used bad judgement in more than one way on this project. Chalk it up to a learning experience and move on would be the smart thing to do.

54 posted on 03/24/2006 9:43:01 AM PST by Ghengis (Alexander was a wuss!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Beth528

I doubt that anyone is going to attend or avoid a film because Randy Quaid is in it.


55 posted on 03/24/2006 9:54:53 AM PST by Coronal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: veronica

I like Randy Quaid but this lawsuit is very similar to a Steve Bozell lawsuit on the Phil Hendrie radio show.
Bozell lawsuits-->>
http://www.angelfire.com/ca4/philhendrie/lawsuits.html


56 posted on 03/24/2006 9:57:04 AM PST by dennisw (-Muslim's biggest enemy is the founder of Islam, Muhammad. Muslims are victims of this evil conman-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

Every actor has an agent and a SAG contract...even low budget movies that are not techinically 'union'....so it depends on what his agent negotiated in his actor's contract. He should have made at least the bottom rung SAG rate for his performance. And if the contract states that he was not to receive compensation because of the 'art film' genre then, he may have a case. He could then, argue that since the movie made money...he is entitled to payment on the 'backend' (pun not really intended).


57 posted on 03/24/2006 10:50:42 AM PST by BossLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: kaboom
He was in Midnight Express.
A great movie about hashish smuggler sent to a Turkish prison.


Written by Oliver Stone
58 posted on 03/24/2006 1:17:44 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: veronica
So he does a movie about getting in the @ss - even while having a wife at home- and he complains about getting it in the @ss by his producers?

lol

59 posted on 03/24/2006 1:22:04 PM PST by the anti-liberal (Hey, Al Qaeda: Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

Cousin Eddie can carry a film!


60 posted on 03/24/2006 1:27:31 PM PST by TravisBickle (Are you talkin' to me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson